Your Mum
Well-known member
- Dec 22, 2016
- 484
your mumI'd get on with salivating over ...
your mumI'd get on with salivating over ...
The food and drink cost for myself and son is £15/20 per game for afternoon games - £10 for evening games. If my season long bill increases by £11 I'll be delighted.
No, but less games also means less revenue for the club.
The loss of revenue from 8 games must amount to quite a bit.
Is it a monopoly? AFAIK North West Sussex Seagulls run their own coaches. I am not aware there is anything to stop a rival operating a competing service.
Higher demand? Will we be getting many more home fans than last season
I would have thought that many operators would welcome the regular commitment, certainly during the leaner winter months, when many of their coaches would be sitting in their depots unused at the weekends.
My wife & I, both season ticket holders,have been using Seagull Travel for the past three seasons. We are very pleased with it and consider it really good.value for money. We have never been let down, as those who advocate using public transport have; we have a guaranteed seat, rather than suffer the overcrowding offered by public transport; on our return to the coach park we can board our coach immediately, rather than queue for ages in the often really bad weather in the open air. These are just some of the reasons we are pleased to be with Seagull Travel. The many moaners on here, who complain that they are paying a bit more for fewer games, might care to consider how much less they will be spending on pies/pints etc at the Amex for those fewer games. I am sure that the amount they "save" on these apparent necessities will far outweigh the extra Seagull Travel costs. As other respondents have suggested, if you don't like it, don't use it. Plenty of others will.
Thank you, based on this, I have now purchased 2 seats for next season. I was reluctant due to the cost, however it seems a stress free way to get to and back from games, so worth the extra cost
I use ST for away games and do find them very good. I would use them for the home games as well but, and this may sound stupid, I find the drive to P&R, the queuing and packed buses and the getting wet waiting for a bus post match all part of the match day experience and would not change it.Thank you, based on this, I have now purchased 2 seats for next season. I was reluctant due to the cost, however it seems a stress free way to get to and back from games, so worth the extra cost
Hi Old Man. Yes I most certainly do remember Southdown. I have only been living in this part of the world since 1989, just before the Stagecoach takeover.
Southdown were running single deckers on what was then the 107 route, and I wasn't aware that the service was ever double deck operated. Indeed, if it was today, then the bus wouldn't be able to get under the railway bridge in the Brighton Road in Horsham![/QUOTE
Interesting. I used to stay on Backhouse farm north of Henfield and one of our treats was to catch the 17 to Horsham and it was a DD. Pretty sure the bridge was there then (late 1950's) so maybe it took a different route but cannot work out what that would be.
Just found this pic of a 17 in Pool Valley confirming DDs did serve the route in the 50's
All are probably true but how many coaches, if any, do Seagulls Travel actually own, all the away coaches are hired from other companies. I appreciate that their charges may have increased but surely they would put their routes out for tender around April time for the next season.
Given that the PL means far less standard timings for games, more mid-week, more sundays etc, I expect that they will struggle to as good a deal for next season than last, known that and hence the increases.
Out of interest, do you get a travel subsidy from the club towards the cost of your coaches?
Higher demand? Will we be getting many more home fans than last season
Is that a serious comment? I think you will find that the club's revenue will be considerably more next season! (Also, where did you get 8 games from, it is only 4 that we lose, ie 19 home games instead of 23?)
8 games overall, the sky money will get swallowed up in the player budget, wages, will cover losses and the repayment of loans to TB.
Revenue lost from the 4 home games cannot be retrieved from other home games, once ground capacity is reached then that's that.
We get money from away games, % of ticket sales etc. not a lot but it will be lost.
We were prevalent in this league this season, so had a lot of televised games, next season there won't be so many as they would rather show the bigger teams from the Premier League.