Parker is signing for Fulham on a 3 year contract.
Very good signing for them, provided they can keep him fit, which is why it's a bit surprising they've given him a 3 year deal at his age and with his injury record. Exactly the type of player Fulham need when they have a few talented but work-shy players in their team (Berbatov, Taarabt, Bent). I think signing Parker and Stekelenburg could see them get a top half finish come the end of the season.
Parker is a terrible player at that level. He's so, so limited on the ball it's untrue. He's just a five-yards sideways man. He doesn't even stand out as an exceptional tackler or leader to make up for the fact he doesn't actually have the ability to do anything remotely useful with a ball at his feet. I can't believe a player like that has played so often for England, or for a club like Spurs, or that he still gets a three-year deal in the EPL at this stage of his career. He's one of those utterly mediocre players nobody would have even noticed if he wasn't English.
I'd say TCB is one of the most knowledgeable on here on the occasions he's not posting for a reaction, and I make him bang RIGHT here.Your knowledge of football really knows no bounds does it
I make Fulham his fifth London club after Charlton, West Ham, Chelsea and Spurs. Has anyone played for more London clubs?
Parker is a terrible player at that level. He's so, so limited on the ball it's untrue. He's just a five-yards sideways man. He doesn't even stand out as an exceptional tackler or leader to make up for the fact he doesn't actually have the ability to do anything remotely useful with a ball at his feet. I can't believe a player like that has played so often for England, or for a club like Spurs, or that he still gets a three-year deal in the EPL at this stage of his career. He's one of those utterly mediocre players nobody would have even noticed if he wasn't English.