thedonkeycentrehalf
Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
- Jul 7, 2003
- 9,340
The guy is The Reverse Rhodes.
Only scores at the AMEX and does fook all everywhere else.
Glenn Murray?
The guy is The Reverse Rhodes.
Only scores at the AMEX and does fook all everywhere else.
But its always more of a gamble bringing someone in from overseas, whether they can adapt to the change and the hurly-burly of this division. You might well end up with a right old Colunga. Hogan has already proved he can score goals in this league, and in a fairly mediocre team (yes I'm aware they turned us over on the day, but the table now would bear that out). The service he'd get from our mob would be absolutely fearsome.
I can't see us coming up with the £10m-odd it would take, but IMO he is exactly what we need this season to get us over the line. So in that respect it would certainly be a worthwhile investment. Not my money though is it.
Talk of Sinclair of Watford on loan i remember .[/QUOTE
Apparently a number of clubs after him in the Championship and Hearts in Scotland.
Is Hogan the new Vydra?
Scores a couple against us and then will forever more be linked as a potential signing.
Quite, it needs to be a similar player to Baldock or someone who is similar to Pritchard. Alan Judge/Zack Clough/Bradley Dack.
The January window is quite difficult and I wonder whether we'll sign anyone.
I thought Brentford got their tactics spot on. I've since learned that they only have one tactic which most other Championship teams have now worked out; long ball to Hogan on the break. They were looking to do this the whole game and the space Bruno is meant to defend was the target area for Hogan to run into.
This won't happen again in the return fixture and they won't score against us.
Meanwhile, unless we plan to play with a speed merchant on the shoulder of the last defender (where Murray likes to position himself), why bother signing Hogan?
None of those players are similar to Baldock, except the fact they only score a handful of goals in a season
Lookman.Yes. But That's why I used "or" in my original quote [emoji4]
A championship Baldock level player is not easy to find. ?Wells, but then shouldn't we be trying to improve?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Norwich have bid 10m for a player (Hogan) who has had 2 serious knee injuries at the age of 24. Combined with the owners rivalry with Bloom this is a non starter.
Too many people obsessing about Lookman because of 1 good game against us. Remember Will Hoskins?
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
There must be hundreds of wingers out there people haven't heard of who aren't going to cost 5m plus like Lookman.Personally I "obsess" about Lookman because when thinking about a 25 man PL squad, then it very likely that we could only fit in 4 wingers and 4 strikers. A player that could play winger or play striker is gold dust. Especially if he is young enough not to count towards the 25 man limit ( Walton and March would now count as above the age limit ).
But yes, he played well against us so must be like Will Hoskins.
Lookman.
Would have the advantage of being a striker or a winger and also still young enough not to count towards PL 25 man squad limits.
There must be hundreds of wingers out there people haven't heard of who aren't going to cost 5m plus like Lookman.
And we're not in the Prem yet.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Norwich have bid 10m for a player (Hogan) who has had 2 serious knee injuries at the age of 24. Combined with the owners rivalry with Bloom this is a non starter.
Too many people obsessing about Lookman because of 1 good game against us. Remember Will Hoskins?
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk