Youre right. The head cant click her fingers and get rid of him. Which is why the 'story' doesnt sit well.
So you're suggesting UKIP are using it as a ploy or excuse ? What is your excuse for not turning up on 16th Oct ?
Youre right. The head cant click her fingers and get rid of him. Which is why the 'story' doesnt sit well.
Well you 'alleged' I bottled out of meeting you , then when I did arrange and turn up for a meet you 'claimed' it was all a cunning ruse and you never had any intention of turning up, I rather think some of your previous posts on the matter give the lie to that particular claimYeah thatll be it...god forbid this is anything to do with the governor or his use of UKIP to 'claim' (a word used in the article) dismissal for political reasons. I believe the story is bollocks.
How many times was the word 'alleged' used in that article thats posted here as more or less 'fact'?
Yes I did - he resigned after pressure form the Head to do so. Did you not read the article ?
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploa..._data/file/352752/Governors_Handbook_2014.pdf
Search Political Bias.
My meetings with UKIP makes me think that the political bias "Faragism" is alarming like the right wing Nazi party.
Why are you going on about due process of the board of governors and them publishing documents then?
The crux of this story seems to really only involve the councillor and the head.
If all the head has done is say she doesn't think his political views are compatible with the school - that doesn't force him to resign. He can sit in front of the governors, state that he would never let his politics influence his decisions as a governor of the school, and even ask of a vote of confidence. Instead he chose to immediately resign, then make a big fuss in the papers.
Well you 'alleged' I bottled out of meeting you , then when I did arrange and turn up for a meet you 'claimed' it was all a cunning ruse and you never had any intention of turning up, I rather think some of your previous posts on the matter give the lie to that particular claim
I'm going on about it because he supports a perfectly legal political party and so the Head shouldn't have even suggested to him his political affiliation had anything to do with his appointment as a governor. If he was pressured to resign then the school could release a statement immediately - they won't so therefore they are making something up.
So you're suggesting UKIP are using it as a ploy or excuse ? What is your excuse for not turning up on 16th Oct ?
But I'm not offended (why would you say that?) I'm just pointing out that in one post you caution people to hear all the evidence first before drawing any conclusions and then you go and piss all over that sage advice by drawing your own very predictable and preconceived conclusions of what happened. Oh and d'oh, indeed.
My excuse for not turning up on the 16th is that im an adult.
yeah of course you are, pointing and laughing all the timeNo im suggesting that its possible that thats the excuse the governnor is usijg for his 'forced' resignation.
My excuse for not turning up on the 16th is that im an adult.
I think you're taking this story far too much at face value. Something doesn't quite ring true with it, for me. I'm sure in time, the truth will out.
Despite you continually saying on here, in public, you were happy to meet up ?? How strange.
I'm going on about it because he supports a perfectly legal political party and so the Head shouldn't have even suggested to him his political affiliation had anything to do with his appointment as a governor. If he was pressured to resign then the school could release a statement immediately - they won't so therefore they are making something up.
I can furnish screenshots of your PM's if you like ?No im suggesting that its possible that thats the excuse the governnor is usijg for his 'forced' resignation.
My excuse for not turning up on the 16th is that im a coward who realised I'd pushed the 'bottler' jokes too far and I was probably going to get a bit of a hiding..
you're a little angel dave , I've seen a softer side of youNot strange at all.. I turned up the first time. Second time, to be honest...I did consider it, but, like I said, if im defending myself, I will use anything
at my disposal, and would have been armed. It was a more delicious thought that the nitwit was frustrated, and wandering around hove rather than being
at home with his plumper.
There is no 'conclusion' as there is no story. Its an 'allegation'.
Oh come on - the Head can't just click her fingers and get rid of him. It would be the board of governors that got rid of him and they would have had to follow the process and document it. One might suggest that all they need to do is publish said documentation and the problem goes away but of course it might implicate the Head and governors - hence why they need time to make up their story.
Not strange at all.. I turned up the first time. Second time, to be honest...I did consider it, but, like I said, if im defending myself, I will use anything
at my disposal, and would have been armed. It was a more delicious thought that the nitwit was frustrated, and wandering around hove rather than being
at home with his plumper.
Sorry to offend you (again) buzzer...but a story on here that has the word 'claims' and 'allegedly' through the whole of it, doesnt mean anything.
oh and doh.