Should be means tested, along with other things at 75+
There are some very wealthy over 75s in this country who own big houses, drive expensive cars, have Sky and go on expensive holidays. Why shouldn’t they pay for their TV licence (and buses!).
Should be means tested, along with other things at 75+
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Great fun isn't it (apostrophe in the right place)
I just think it's wrong. Ever heard of the Blitz, imagine being a child living through that. I can still remember rationing etc which went on for quite a time after the war. Going to Holland in August to visit my partners grandfathers grave. Personal invitation to all the family's of the soldiers who gave their lives on the 75th anniversary so they were liberated
My partners grandfather gave his live the day before my partners mother was born
So take the piss all you want and be happy you were lucky enough not to live then.
Anyway who watches BBC
apart from that generation
I don't think that anyone is saying that we shouldn't respect service, experience or value our elderly. That is a part of the social contract that we all enter into through the welfare state and the greatest post war achievement of the generation you are defending was to vote in a government who built that.
However the underlying message that should be taken from this story is not that one generation does not value the contribution of another, it is that our government doesn't want to have to fund the BBC. They threw the BBC under the bus knowing that they must choose between doing something very expensive or very unpopular. The government makes the saving, the BBC takes the flak. The fact that this decision could impact upon the popularity of the BBC and start people talking about cuts or alternative means of funding is a win-win for a government that does not like the BBC's funding model and would take great pleasure in dismantling one of the UK's greatest institutions, selling the popular bits to Murdoch and his fellow weasels and freeing themselves from the costs of the less popular but socially valuable parts.
Should be means tested, along with other things at 75+
Many of them are living in care & don’t pay anyway.
I do agree the Tories have reneged on their promises but what else is new?
Absolutely. Why is it that suddenly so many things become cheaper at retirement age, yet many people of that generation retired on full pay pensions etc. Should all be means tested as you said.
As for the meme...
Absolutely. Why is it that suddenly so many things become cheaper at retirement age, yet many people of that generation retired on full pay pensions etc. Should all be means tested as you said.
As for the meme...
And of course the unnecessary apostrophe in the thread title is an invitation to the pedants
It must frustrate some (of the smaller) football clubs that their over 60/65 supporters pay significantly less for their season tickets when some can easily afford to pay full price, when a fan aged say 40 with a couple of kids can’t afford to go (at full price).
All forgetting that the government made the promise but didn’t give the BBC the money to cover the cost and are now letting the BBC take the flack for another of their failed promises
I understand that the Government allowed the BBC to put up the licence fee in return for taking on the cost of maintaining the free licence cost.
Apparently, BBC boss Lord Hall was happy with this arrangement and is reported saying that they would make a small surplus.
As an aside, in these days of media revolution, the TV licence is surely a bit of an anachronism. There must be a good case to be made for scrapping the thing and getting the Beeb to move into the 21st Century.
...and how would you pay for TV from the BBC? By monthly subscription, like Sky, Netflix, Amazon, Virgin? What's the difference?
By the way, the BBC has been in a process of disbanding it's core activities - it used to be a world leader in broadcast engineering, now it barely does anything in that area.
I don't agree.
It is right that elderly folk should not have the burden of paying for things that taxes can provide them comfort with.
However, there are large numbers of elderly folk for whom the TV license fee is absolutely no burden.
To say this is a travesty of justice, and suggest it is a dereliction of duty to heroic service, is righteous indignation intended to hold a faux moral high ground.
The elderly in this country are let down in many ways. This is not one of them.