Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Where would [MENTION=38]Beach Hut[/MENTION] sit if NO first class ?
Precisely and to add insult to injury my train was SASTERED this morning and 22 minutes late
Last edited:
Where would [MENTION=38]Beach Hut[/MENTION] sit if NO first class ?
Is there any purpose in having a first-class carriage? Aside from milking eye-watering amounts of money from gullible passengers?
I don't really know a great deal of the ins and outs of train related politics but the gentleman quoted seems to be a bit of a pillock, surely blaming drivers for the vast myriad of issues is like blaming a striker for the defence smashing in a few own goals?According to this, despite admitting they are not able to improve services, it seems like the government is looking to pick a fight with the train drivers next, as if the fiasco is their fault...
http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/...rain-drivers/story-28783309-detail/story.html
A SENIOR official at the Department for Transport says train drivers who resist changes to their working hours can "get the hell out of my industry".
Peter Wilkinson, managing director of passenger services, told a public meeting in Croydon there will be "punch ups" with drivers when the Government changes their working hours to improve rail services.
His comments suggest the Government is prepared for another protracted industrial dispute following Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt's bitter row with junior doctors.
"Over the next three years we're going to be having punch ups and we will see industrial action and I want your support," Mr Wilkinson told residents in Croydon Town Hall last Thursday during a meeting organised by Croydon Central MP Gavin Barwell.
Mr Wilkinson said train drivers are paid high salaries of about £60,000 a year or more to work three days a week, with no obligation to work on Sundays. He told the meeting drivers still have the same "fire break" rest stops as they did when trains were run on coal.
"I'm furious about it and it has got to change - we have got to break them," he said. "They have all borrowed money to buy cars and got credit cards.
"They can't afford to spend too long on strike and I will push them into that place. They will have to decide if they want to give a good service or get the hell out of my industry."
Mr Wilkinson said the DfT has a four to five-year plan to improve services by the end of which he hopes Croydon passengers will not need to check timetables, with trains so frequent there will be a "turn up and go" service.
He apologised to residents for the current level of service, and promised more drivers, more commuter trains and more Gatwick Express trains with free wi-fi at a number of stations to be introduced this year.
Alex Foulds, passenger services director at Southern, said 152 new drivers were in training and will start work throughout this year in the biggest recruitment the under-fire rail company has ever undertaken.
Alasdair Coates, Network Rail route managing director for the South East, said some of the providers' best engineers have been posted at key junctions so they are on hand to deal with signalling problems quickly.
Network Rail is also working with the British Transport Police to get officers to incidents as quickly as possible.
But, despite this, Mr Wilkinson said he could not promise services will have improved in 18 months' time.
Mr Wilkinson added he did not think there are any rail companies who would run services better than Southern, which currently holds the franchise but is due to lose its London-only lines.
Thameslink work to rebuild London Bridge has increased delays through Croydon because platform closures mean lines are running at full capacity, making it harder to recover from delays, said Mr Barwell.
Mr Wilkinson told the meeting not even extra cash could speed up the work.
"Even with more money there is a finite limit to human and machine resources," he said. "There is 24/7 work there. I genuinely don't think we could speed that up."
I don't see that he has blamed drivers for the charade that is Southern, however his attitude appears to be incredibly flaming, and assuming this report to be absolutely word correct, it would indeed appear he is one huge pillock.
Interesting times ahead, Southern want to close most booking offices on their network, get rid of Guards from the trains and god knows what else to improve profits. Can see some terrible times in the near future for commuting once the industrial action both official and non official starts
No guards - presumably that will help with the 'Southern are sorry to announce that the xx:xx to xxxxxxx is delayed/cancelled, due to waiting for/lack of train crew' ?
Agree.
I really dont know what purpose the guards serve TBH. Most Thameslink trains dont have one. Glorified revenue inspectors basically.
For one, if the driver is injured, they are there to protect a derailed train from being hit by another by laying track circuit clips and dets and organising assistance from rescue services.
Interesting times ahead, Southern want to close most booking offices on their network, get rid of Guards from the trains and god knows what else to improve profits. Can see some terrible times in the near future for commuting once the industrial action both official and non official starts
For one, if the driver is injured, they are there to protect a derailed train from being hit by another by laying track circuit clips and dets and organising assistance from rescue services.
Wasn't the reason Thameslink said they couldn't run 12 car trains is because it's mandatory for them to have guards over 8 cars? So were Thameslink lying about their rolling stock or are safety standards being compromised for profit?
Agree.
I really dont know what purpose the guards serve TBH. Most Thameslink trains dont have one. Glorified revenue inspectors basically.
Wasn't the reason Thameslink said they couldn't run 12 car trains is because it's mandatory for them to have guards over 8 cars? So were Thameslink lying about their rolling stock or are safety standards being compromised for profit?
Seems to me there should be two separate job titles. In fact there probably are. The guard looks after the well-being of the passengers, ensures it's ding-ding safe for the driver to pull away from smaller stations (unlike, say, East Croydon, where it needs several blokes with paddleboards and several minutes delay to do the same thing). The revenue 'protectors' check tickets and issue 'penalty fares'. Funnily enough, the guards on the East & West Coast lines will usually quite happily issue you with a ticket if you don't have one (and probably had no intention of buying one) whereas the guys on the mainline will more often than not stick to the book. As with everything with the privatised railways it's a bit of a shambolic mess.
Thameslink only haver revenue protection officers who are licensed to issue penalty fares
Wasn't the reason Thameslink said they couldn't run 12 car trains is because it's mandatory for them to have guards over 8 cars? So were Thameslink lying about their rolling stock or are safety standards being compromised for profit?
Agree.
I really dont know what purpose the guards serve TBH. Most Thameslink trains dont have one. Glorified revenue inspectors basically.