BRIGHT ON Q
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 9,247
I must admit i am a little concerned about Sandaza but before i get flame grilled i am happy to wait and give him a chance.
Sandaza should not have STARTED last night... Gus' mistake... on the evidence so far, it's back on the sub's bench for him for the Tranmere game...
Sandaza should not have STARTED last night... Gus' mistake... on the evidence so far, it's back on the sub's bench for him for the Tranmere game...
Murray was RESTED. He HAD to start.
CHRIST.
How can you say Gus made a mistake? We WON! Had Murray started instead of him, for all you know, the game could have been completly different and we may not have taken the points. Buy leaving Murray on the bench, it gave Murray a point to prove when he came on.
Gus was once again, spot on.
Over-defensive... chill... Gus is human you know... yes, we won, but it was touch and go...
For those at the game last night...........
told yer so!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm happy to give Sandaza a chance but I'm not sure we should be using first team games to get him fit. This decision nearly backfired last night. The improvement in our game when Murray came on was very, very apparent.
I realise you are probably on some sort of hilarious wind up but it is pathetic. We win again and all you can do is gloat because a player you wrote off after two games didn't have a good game in his third match for us. Nobody on this thread has guaranteed that Sandaza will be great for us but to write him off is ludicrous. Why can't we all just support our players and enjoy being top of the league?
Not a wind up just expressing an opinion.
Isn't that the beauty of football?
Sadly there are one or two on here who wont accept anyone else's opinion or agree to differ.
Probably described as self righteous.
For those at the game last night...........
told yer so!!!!!!!!!!!