safe standing or all seater

[Return of the Rev]

If the amex could be converted to part seats part safe standing but with a 25,000 capacity or all seater 30,000 which would you choose?
# would you be happy to pay seat prices for standing

 

[Pogue Mahone]

If the amex could be converted to part seats part safe standing but with a 25,000 capacity or all seater 30,000 which would you choose?
# would you be happy to pay seat prices for standing

What a bizarre question. Why would capacity be less if we had safe standing?

 

[Return of the Rev]

What a bizarre question. Why would capacity be less if we had safe standing?

i would imagine so

 

[Pogue Mahone]

i would imagine so

Borrusia Dotmund's capacity is 80000 when they have safe standing and 65000 when they seat these areas (for internationals or European matches). Safe standing would increase capacity.
But answering your question, 30000 wins.

 

[sparkie]

Both safe standing and 30,000 possible ( if the law is changed).

 

[Return of the Rev]

Does anyone respond to a question without a question

 

[Pogue Mahone]

Does anyone respond to a question without a question

What's that got to do with it?

 

[Return of the Rev]

What's that got to do with it?

AFRICAN OR EUROPEAN?

 

[Chamberpot]

Obviously I would take the safe standing cause their would be an increased capacity and I'd rather stand than sit whilst watching football. Maybe the stands behind the goal should have safe standing, just as a trail and to see how people cope with that then if we wanted expand it too every seat in the ground. Won't happen though because of the cost plus I can't see high english teams taking this approach.

 

[k2bluesky]

Yep 25,000 or close creates a terrific atmosphere at Norwich and would still ensure a full house at most games. If the authorities have any problems with standing behind the goals at the Albion, have a word with Chelsea first (or is it allowed in the champions league!!)

 

[Franks Wild Years]

Does anyone respond to a question without a question

That's a good question, isn't it ?

 

[Return of the Rev]

Obviously I would take the safe standing cause their would be an increased capacity and I'd rather stand than sit whilst watching football. Maybe the stands behind the goal should have safe standing, just as a trail and to see how people cope with that then if we wanted expand it too every seat in the ground. Won't happen though because of the cost plus I can't see high english teams taking this approach.

 

[Hillian1]

A few bean bags dotted around the place would be nice.

 

[LamieRobertson]

A few bean bags dotted around the place would be nice.

lol

 

[Badger]

Would kids be allowed to take crates into the ground?

 

[GT49er]

Would kids be allowed to take crates into the ground?

Presumably only if they were properly regulated SAFE crates

 

[Shooting Star]

Would kids be allowed to take crates into the ground?

Fosters?

 

[Braders]

Safe standing if possible , give people the option with less hassle for stewards

it's a nice dream but I doubt it will ever happen.

 

[PC-Gull]

I would pick safe standing as there would be less for maintenance as there would be fewer seats to fix etc. Plus the extra capacity is a great bonus.

 

[theyellowdinosaur]

Aston Villa are going to be testing it next year (i think)