beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,006
After what they've done, if I was Ukrainian, POWs would not be on my bloody agenda.
of course they would because they're better.
After what they've done, if I was Ukrainian, POWs would not be on my bloody agenda.
Maybe Renault limos for the Duma?
Actually, I did read somewhere that Renault are in a big joint venture with a local company with many 100s staff involved if they close down. I'm not defending their decision, which still seems bizarre given the French state % ownership
That would be a very bad move. What is the point of surrendering if you are going to be shot. You might as well fight to the last bullet.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
After what they've done, if I was Ukrainian, POWs would not be on my bloody agenda.
I would assume Covid ripping through your army isn’t a great idea during an invasion.
Renault owns 2/3rds of the Lada maker, but Russian State owns a share too, not sure the decision is all on Renault. Decathlon however, ******** looking to take advantage of the void left by companies with a conscience.
After what they've done, if I was Ukrainian, POWs would not be on my bloody agenda.
Well it may give them alot of prisoners to exchange for the people the b ast ard Russians have taken across the border.
Because of the uncertainty. It would have been a bit of a bummer for Russia if they had invaded and only then discovered they needed a western vaccine for a nasty variant.why does covid delay the invasion?
While Putin and China may want to expand their empires, my point is that the larger world is against such expansion, right?It was for a while. No longer. Although the terminology has changed. It's 'civilizationalism' that Putin ultimately believes in.
I thought that was under the order or Putin (yes Medvedev was supposedly in charge, but I thought Putin was really)?medvedev did it
Of course, but that's why the Russian playbook we keep hearing about it to keep pummelling and starving a city until they surrender, so they don't have to go in to fight.I think the key thing is it's easy to pummel cities with missiles from a distance. To take, occupy and defend a city requires your own troops to be in that city
Indeed.If that was Boris we'd be inundated with accusations and memes by now, Macron seems to get away scott free with his duplicitous behaviour.
Is that a sick joke? Surely this can't be happening?Also read yesterday that french retailers are planning to expand in Russia, filling the gap left by other Western companies. No pressure from the government at all to not do it.
I thought that was under the order or Putin (yes Medvedev was supposedly in charge, but I thought Putin was really)?
Because of the uncertainty. It would have been a bit of a bummer for Russia if they had invaded and only then discovered they needed a western vaccine for a nasty variant.
While Putin and China may want to expand their empires, my point is that the larger world is against such expansion, right?
Of course, but that's why the Russian playbook we keep hearing about it to keep pummelling and starving a city until they surrender, so they don't have to go in to fight.
Fascinating thanks. Quietly hopeful reading thatAnother interesting thread
[tweet]1506444520103292930[/tweet]