Oh right. If that's what you want, lets make a budgie our head of state.Royalist. Much prefer to have a neutral figurehead as head of state.
I am highly suspicious of this. Presumably this doesn't take into account the loss of tax revenue that should have been taken from the wealthist family in the land for the past several hundred years.edit - and compared to elected officials cost very little. Look how much that utter tosser Prescott cost the country in his final year.
Oh right. If that's what you want, lets make a budgie our head of state.
I am highly suspicious of this. Presumably this doesn't take into account the loss of tax revenue that should have been taken from the wealthist family in the land for the past several hundred years.
Maybe there should be a CULLING
I am highly suspicious of this. Presumably this doesn't take into account the loss of tax revenue that should have been taken from the wealthist family in the land for the past several hundred years.
because a council would never get anything done and would just create even more costs. witness the EU.
Fair enough - you've completely pissed on my chips there. My argument about loss of tax is now redundant because apparently the Royal family is not THE wealthiest family in the country.what does the wealthiest family in the country have to do with it? oh, i see, you believe that this is the Royal family. not even close.
Fair enough - you've completely pissed on my chips there. My argument about loss of tax is now redundant because apparently the Royal family is not THE wealthiest family in the country.
We may as well not bother claiming back that tax now.
There is absolutely no excuse for anything hereditary in a mature polity.
So when your parents die, you'll donate the proceeds of the sale of their home to charity?
When my grandparents died, their homes reverted to the local council - who rented them out to new tenants.
That seemed fair to them. They saw it as a sign of a fair society.
I would love to see public executions of Royalty brought back.
Imagine the whinging on here though by those who could not get a ticket for when the monarch gets the chop.
( I`ve been too 17 executions of Earls, Barons and Dukes this year but I can`t get a ticket for the big one )
I'll take the option of an elected head of state, the massive cost savings, none of the nausiating lick-spittling cow-towing, and status of citizen rather than a subject please. Oh no! The French have done it already, it *must* be wrong!
But wait, astonishingly the French do get some things right; such as improved distribution of wealth, the metric system and a better standard of living than the UK for about 20 of the last 30 years.
FOR GOD, QUEEN AND EMPIRE!!
Having a Monarchy is a key element of what defines being British. It is part of our history and our culture. It sets us apart from simple republics like France, and keeps our Head of State outside the political realm, which I think is a particularly good thing.
So when your parents die, you'll donate the proceeds of the sale of their home to charity?
We did try being a Republic, it didn't work out...