looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
It was 10 years after her murder, but even if it was 10 mins, its no defence.
I didn't say it was spaz I said it may be a reason that polanski may not be a recidavist.
It was 10 years after her murder, but even if it was 10 mins, its no defence.
I didn't say it was spaz I said it may be a reason that polanski may not be a recidavist.
Would all this uproar from the French and Polish Governments been so audible if the person in question wasn't a famous Polish/French resident but instead a Polish plumber from a dodgy part of Paris. Of course not. Roman is just a peado who did a plea bargin and then skipped the country to avoid any further attempts to arrest him for the buggering of a 13 year old girl who he had to drug first and forgot to get her consent.
Time should never be an excuse not to ensure people face trial for their crimes, otherwise we would have not bothered with the Nuremberg trials
I agree with the sentiment of your post 100%, but as a bored pedant, I feel I must point out at the Nuremberg were held immediately after WW2, so are not the best example.
The key here is that Polanski was found guilty, then did a runner to avoid US justice. Everybody knows he's done wrong, yet he hasn't paid for his crime. That HAS to be wrong.
Both Ronnie Biggs and Roman Polanski knew they were guilty but fled to avoid justice, and it is surely ABSOLUTELY crucial to demonstrate that factors such as advanced age, illness or even the victim's viewpoint will not prevent the course of justice.
We don't want criminals thinking if they can make it past 70 then they're safe; surely the prospect of your sentence starting at that age and that you could die in prison builds up the deterrent?
He will probablyget House Arrest.
But then, if he was Joe Blow living down the High Street......
I agree with the sentiment of your post 100%, but as a bored pedant, I feel I must point out at the Nuremberg were held immediately after WW2, so are not the best example.
Indeed you may. The sentiment was more that trials where held and no matter what or where you were you were bought to justice, maybe the Simon Wiesenthal Trust would be a better example as they to this day still try and bring murderers to book.
Possibly none.I wonder how many people there are around the world, with passports saying "Roman Polanski" born in Poland etc. etc.
Its astonishing that people are prepared to defend this sex offender, I keep thinking that it's some sort of wind up.
i like blondes with big tits, no amount of "counselling" or sessions on a psychciatrist's couch woud change that.
I agree, reading the comments calmed me down a bit after reading that trashy article. To be honest, I am suprised and disgusted that the Indy even printed it. I may well write a letter of complaint.
Not long to go now El pres , 17 oct , cant waitYou are going to so love Bredbury Hall
It's rather like the current debate over whether the BNP should be allowed on Question Time; do you give these people a platform or just ignore them?
My personal opinion is that you should allow people these platforms, just so you can highlight how silly/short-sighted their viewpoint is. I think the Indy, by simply having the article there with no commentary, have allowed Weinstein to make himself look very silly.