Hindsight and hindsight... thought it was a strange sub the moment it was made and pretty sure I'm not the only one.Exactly as I see it ….all the questioning of subs is using a lot of hindsight ..
Hindsight and hindsight... thought it was a strange sub the moment it was made and pretty sure I'm not the only one.Exactly as I see it ….all the questioning of subs is using a lot of hindsight ..
I don’t disagree, re quality, and since Murray retired it’s no secret we have been lacking in that respect. However, you set the tactics and put players into positions, you don’t have your 11 best players based on ability, as we’d have 7 defenders and four midfield players.Tactics play a part, but its not close to important as quality & attributes among the players. Bringing on Enciso didn't help the team, but lacking players who thrive in crowded penalty area has proven to be costly many times and could potentially have sorted a point today. There was no chance of getting to good opportunities through the center, and for anyone on the wings there was really nothing to cross the ball to either.
Dunk was having a stinker after 2 mins ?Personally I think RdZ got the Lallana sub wrong, to me Dunk was having a stinker and needed Veltman, Pascal could have then moved forward, and got closer to Welbeck (which tactically was not happening).
Potter used to successfully switch several times a game, so even though the players apply them, in reality actually how you set up and what you do is fairly significant IMO.
Fair pointDunk was having a stinker after 2 mins ?
….as I’m not the only one who didn’t think it wasHindsight and hindsight... thought it was a strange sub the moment it was made and pretty sure I'm not the only one.
I wasn’t surprised…shrugNot really, felt the obvious move was to shift Gross there….. Was surprised to see Enciso who looked out of his depth IMO, against a physical team.
Each to their own….as I’m not the only one who didn’t think it was
YepEach to their own
Agree it was a bizarre sub. Enciso has looked raw and a bit indisciplined, thought Gilmour was the clear favourite to be subbed on with Ali Mac or Gross shifted further forward. RDZ kind of acknowledged his mistake a bit later.Hindsight and hindsight... thought it was a strange sub the moment it was made and pretty sure I'm not the only one.
Yeah, but we're not being paid to manage Premier League football teams are we?….as I’m not the only one who didn’t think it was
Enciso against Chelsea was a very, very clever substitution.Agree it was a bizarre sub. Enciso has looked raw and a bit indisciplined, thought Gilmour was the clear favourite to be subbed on with Ali Mac or Gross shifted further forward. RDZ kind of acknowledged his mistake a bit later.
No. Gilmour is (to me at least) more in the Ali Mac/Caicedo mould…….Lallana was in the no 10 slot, which is more suited to Enciso so it made sense to me at the time (I might be doing BG a disservice but haven’t seen enough of him), particularly after how he played in the week. If Sarmiento had been fit suspect he’d have been brought on….as I’m not the only one who didn’t think it was
A few months ago it would surely have been Mwepu. Miss the bloke.No. Gilmour is (to me at least) more in the Ali Mac/Caicedo mould…….Lallana was in the no 10 slot, which is more suited to Enciso so it made sense to me at the time (I might be doing BG a disservice but haven’t seen enough of him), particularly after how he played in the week. If Sarmiento had been fit suspect he’d have been brought on
Erm…but then I think I and others are saying he didn’t get it wrongYeah, but we're not being paid to manage Premier League football teams are we?
Sometimes managers get it wrong. Sometimes they get it right or make bugger all difference. Over the length of a season their tactics tend to be fairly marginal as far as the points total is concerned.
RDZ probably thought he got it wrong... hence subbing Enciso off again before the hour mark.Erm…but then I think I and others are saying he didn’t get it wrong
Yes, but there's no consequence to you being wrong.Erm…but then I think I and others are saying he didn’t get it wrong
Or a change of tactics (Veltman was his replacement not Gilmour)…or seeing the player not fulfilling the role he was asked to doRDZ probably thought he got it wrong... hence subbing Enciso off again before the hour mark.
Replacing Lallana with Enciso was very wrong, he was as bad as any sub since we reached the PL. He was useless and gave the ball away in 100% of his touches from what I sawErm…but then I think I and others are saying he didn’t get it wrong
Yep best not trust him to play for Brighton ever again ….sorry but that’s hindsightReplacing Lallana with Enciso was very wrong, he was as bad as any sub since we reached the PL. He was useless and gave the ball away in 100% of his touches from what I saw