Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Robert Sanchez to Chelsea for £25m plus add-ons



















dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,272
London
I for one hope we are withholding his pay if he's not making himself available. If I didn't fancy going to my work for a month or two I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be paid, or I'd be fired.
If we didn't pay him he would have grounds to tear up his contract. It's all too messy, we need to find a club to offload him to. I think it will be a last day transfer window loan. Then hopefully he does well and we can sell at a tidy profit.
 






Javeaseagull

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 22, 2014
2,830
If we didn't pay him he would have grounds to tear up his contract. It's all too messy, we need to find a club to offload him to. I think it will be a last day transfer window loan. Then hopefully he does well and we can sell at a tidy profit.
Not sure I agree. If he is not turning up for work he is liable to be fined no? Either way it can't go on.
 


Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,274
Breaking news: Bob has made himself unavailable for lunch.
 






wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,915
Melbourne
...and sue the club for the balance of the guaranteed income within it (subject to mitigation).
But surely this also works in reverse, if he refuses to play/work we can then tear up the contract? He gets a free transfer, we save his wages and then sue for however long the situation has been thus?
 


Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,286
If we didn't pay him he would have grounds to tear up his contract. It's all too messy, we need to find a club to offload him to. I think it will be a last day transfer window loan. Then hopefully he does well and we can sell at a tidy profit.
If he’s getting fined in accordance with his contract he won’t have grounds.
 


schmunk

Why oh why oh why?
Jan 19, 2018
10,369
Mid mid mid Sussex
But surely this also works in reverse, if he refuses to play/work we can then tear up the contract? He gets a free transfer, we save his wages and then sue for however long the situation has been thus?
Yes, but it's not quite that simple. Despite the **footballer** razzmatazz, he's still just an employee (with >24 months continuous service) so there is a process to follow to avoid an Employment Tribunal claim.
 




Horses Arse

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2004
4,571
here and there
If we didn't pay him he would have grounds to tear up his contract. It's all too messy, we need to find a club to offload him to. I think it will be a last day transfer window loan. Then hopefully he does well and we can sell at a tidy profit.
If he refuses to play, refuses to abide by the companies policies and rules etc then he wouldn't be in a position to tear up his contract. Who knows what conditions are in each players contract but if players could just refuse to play and still get paid then forcing a departure would be far more frequent, especially in the summer. Caceido would be on that right now without any doubt
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,017
Pattknull med Haksprut
This came from a Rochdale sauce

Trains when he wants
Sits on the bench when he wants
Flys when he wants

IMG_8729.jpeg
 


jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
14,596
Gone very quiet. He’s clearly going, surprised nothing firm yet. I predict a loan with option to buy, probably to Spain.
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here