....and I hope the lad has a good season too! Very good keeper and a good signing for someone!
100% agree (preferably not against us though)
....and I hope the lad has a good season too! Very good keeper and a good signing for someone!
Even worse, he’d possibly refuse to go if it wasn’t to a bigger club than the Albion.Bad news for us if we can't offload him, might end up having to send him out on loan.
Maybe Inter would take him if Chelsea want their No.1?I think he’ll end up abroad (not USG).
Agree. His attitude is questionable based on what we know, however, it doesn’t make him a bad goalkeeper, and he is going to continue learning and improving.Maybe Inter would take him if Chelsea want their No.1?
He is looked after by the same agency as Dunk, Lallana, Gilmour, Adingra and Boey. We surely have a good relationship with them and can make sure that all sides come out of his next move happy.
I still think he has massive potential and is one of the best keepers around. DeZerbiball is not quite his thing but I’m sure he’ll thrive at another club. He has a good 10 years ahead of him, let’s hope we get a decent fee.
That attitude can be flipped. That intense and competitive desire to be No.1 might be seen as others as a strength. Yes, the toys came out of the pram but if you are a team signing him as your No.1, would you be that worried about his dislike of the bench? Especially as he was probably worth north of £30m prior to the tantrum and would now be cheaper (enough to cover the fee for the new Dutch stopper).Agree. His attitude is questionable based on what we know, however, it doesn’t make him a bad goalkeeper, and he is going to continue learning and improving.
I wouldn't call his behaviour an intense and competitive desire to be No.1. Yes, the toys came out of the pram, but he was prepared to throw his team mates, the club and the fans under a bus and put at risk qualification to Europe by downing tools. There was no benefit to anyone in that scenario. He showed no good qualities in himself, no integrity, no loyalty, no strength of character. There could be no positive outcome at that moment as he couldn't leave the club until after the season finished. And he missed one of the few opportunities in a short career to celebrate achieving something. Qualification to the Europa League was massive and he may never again have the chance to get on the pitch and enjoy such a moment again. I'd like to say that I hope he does, but frankly I don't care. Just want him out.That attitude can be flipped. That intense and competitive desire to be No.1 might be seen as others as a strength. Yes, the toys came out of the pram but if you are a team signing him as your No.1, would you be that worried about his dislike of the bench? Especially as he was probably worth north of £30m prior to the tantrum and would now be cheaper (enough to cover the fee for the new Dutch stopper).
I tend to agree. Competitiveness is, of course, a big part of player mindset at the top level. Losing his spot would have stung and not getting it back after we shipped 5 v Everton would have felt pretty grim, but from that point he stopped trying to get the no. 1 spot back. That's not competitiveness, that's petulance.I wouldn't call his behaviour an intense and competitive desire to be No.1. Yes, the toys came out of the pram, but he was prepared to throw his team mates, the club and the fans under a bus and put at risk qualification to Europe by downing tools. There was no benefit to anyone in that scenario. He showed no good qualities in himself, no integrity, no loyalty, no strength of character. There could be no positive outcome at that moment as he couldn't leave the club until after the season finished. And he missed one of the few opportunities in a short career to celebrate achieving something. Qualification to the Europa League was massive and he may never again have the chance to get on the pitch and enjoy such a moment again. I'd like to say that I hope he does, but frankly I don't care. Just want him out.
Definitely. No one would be calling it competitiveness if we were playing Mcgee against Southampton because of an injury to Steele.I wouldn't call his behaviour an intense and competitive desire to be No.1. Yes, the toys came out of the pram, but he was prepared to throw his team mates, the club and the fans under a bus and put at risk qualification to Europe by downing tools. There was no benefit to anyone in that scenario. He showed no good qualities in himself, no integrity, no loyalty, no strength of character. There could be no positive outcome at that moment as he couldn't leave the club until after the season finished. And he missed one of the few opportunities in a short career to celebrate achieving something. Qualification to the Europa League was massive and he may never again have the chance to get on the pitch and enjoy such a moment again. I'd like to say that I hope he does, but frankly I don't care. Just want him out.
There is only one Jason Steele, he's no Kerry Mayo!I tend to agree. Competitiveness is, of course, a big part of player mindset at the top level. Losing his spot would have stung and not getting it back after we shipped 5 v Everton would have felt pretty grim, but from that point he stopped trying to get the no. 1 spot back. That's not competitiveness, that's petulance.
As you say, he cost himself the chance to be a part of some pretty enjoyable moments and let's not forget was also the goalkeeper for our trip to Wembley, so clearly was still in RDZ's plans at that point. I keep asking myself, what if Steele got injured after he downed tools? Would he then be happy to "play a part" again? Or would we have had to rely on the untested Tom McGill?
He placed an unnecessary focus on the GK position with his decision to walk out. Going into next season with Steele, Verbruggen, Steele, Rushworth, Beadle isn't a bad place to be.
I completely agree with this.If nobody comes in and pay the asking price then we should absolutely be prepared to have him rotting in the under 23’s next season. The £25 million or so is worth the statement it makes to other players coming in- if you throw a strop it won’t work out for you. Do your time properly and we’ll help you get that big move.
Exactly this!I wouldn't call his behaviour an intense and competitive desire to be No.1. Yes, the toys came out of the pram, but he was prepared to throw his team mates, the club and the fans under a bus and put at risk qualification to Europe by downing tools. There was no benefit to anyone in that scenario. He showed no good qualities in himself, no integrity, no loyalty, no strength of character. There could be no positive outcome at that moment as he couldn't leave the club until after the season finished. And he missed one of the few opportunities in a short career to celebrate achieving something. Qualification to the Europa League was massive and he may never again have the chance to get on the pitch and enjoy such a moment again. I'd like to say that I hope he does, but frankly I don't care. Just want him out.
I’d be worried that he may disrupt the wider team ethos if he didn’t get his own way, and the fact he apparently doesn’t like sitting on the bench, would be a concern. Perception is everything, and I kind of don’t agree about the attitude being ‘flipped’, because from the outside once it’s exposed, it’s ‘out there’, and he has it in his make-up.That attitude can be flipped. That intense and competitive desire to be No.1 might be seen as others as a strength. Yes, the toys came out of the pram but if you are a team signing him as your No.1, would you be that worried about his dislike of the bench? Especially as he was probably worth north of £30m prior to the tantrum and would now be cheaper (enough to cover the fee for the new Dutch stopper).