Danny Seagull said:Oh bloody brilliant. Another monumental cock-up by the club. Well done
Lord Bracknell said:I think the playing budget is in SC's control. There's no evidence that it is being raided to fund other things.
teaboy said:From someone who knows:
John Robinson was willing to take a substancial wage cut in order to come to Brighton, but was left hanging on longer than he felt necessary without any decisions being made. The club only has itself to blame.
I don't know what money either party were talking about, but he will always be a Brighton man at heart.
I have this info from direct from Robinson's best man at his wedding, so is reliable.
Mullers said:As for Falmer, it will be an asset owned by the club and others. That investment should be funded by shareholders, not from ticket sales!
mad:
A number of us might recall a conversation, at the end of last season, just before the REMF game, when "someone closely associated with the club" revealed that, by second division standards, Steve Coppell was very satisfied with the playing budget he would have available for 2003/04.Mullers said:No and there is no evidence that he has been given a decent budget to start with!
It became clear at the Public Inquiry that Falmer will be funded by loans, and that a proportion of the loans would be secured against future season ticket sales.As for Falmer, it will be an asset owned by the club and others. That investment should be funded by shareholders, not from ticket sales!
slug balancer said:I know shit all about about anything at the moment - but maybe the board is hoping with the current crop of players and no new signings that promotion isn't unrealistic - and with the funds going towards Falmer, they are hoping for blues skies ahead. Really it seems everything is resting on it. But what do I know.