[Politics] Rhian Brewster

[Wellesley]

Sky Sports News says he's signing for Sheffield United today.

(Not really, but I keep expecting to see a post like this to kill our enthusiasm.)

 

[Hugo Rune]

Rubbish

You’re right.

Although, like a lot of Bournemouth players, he was a bit shitehouse last season and failed to make the staring 11 on a number of occasions.

If Ajax are going to give us good money for Jahanbakhsh, it makes sense to bring in this guy.

https://youtu.be/WPW9dwVkp2Y

He is faster than Ali-J, left footed and has an eye for goal. He can score direct free kicks and is a threat from shooting outside the box.

How many players do we currently have who you’d back to score from outside the box? Not a lot.

Him and Rhian would give us an excellent chance of top 10.

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Rubbish

Based on what?
The fact he lit up the PL? ............ er no.
Or is he better than our current players - not IMO


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[southstandandy]

I know some people don't like the idea of having Brewster potentially on loan, but for me football is largely all about the here and now. If he came on loan and did a good job (ultimately aiding his development for Liverpool) I have no problem with that. We would just then next summer need to look again for another forward.

It seems almost every summer we're looking for a striker in one way or another, so whether Brewster came on loan or permanently I wouldn't mind. Plus, if it was a loan and didn't work out we're not stuck with a player who wasn't that successful. In hindsight I wished the deals to bring Ali J and Locadia had been loans, then at least we could have sent them back!

Not sure about Wilson though.

 

[vagabond]

If he came on loan and did a good job (ultimately aiding his development for Liverpool) I have no problem with that. We would just then next summer need to look again for another forward.

Then it begs the question, why not sign a forward now rather than next season? Just seems like delaying a decision and not very forward thinking.

I’m holding out hope we’ll get Brewster on a permanent deal with an agreement Liverpool have first option.

Let’s see what happens. Fans forum tomorrow I believe. So something may happen today or tomorrow.

 

[southstandandy]

Then it begs the question, why not sign a forward now rather than next season? Just seems like delaying a decision and not very forward thinking.

I’m holding out hope we’ll get Brewster on a permanent deal with an agreement Liverpool have first option.

Let’s see what happens. Fans forum tomorrow I believe. So something may happen today or tomorrow.

I'm not saying a permanent deal wouldn't be good, but if Liverpool were to insist on a loan only, then I'd take that as opposed to scratching around last minute for a bargain bin deal from what's left. As you say tomorrow's forum (for once) might be quite interesting and actually worth tuning in to!

 

[Hugo Rune]

Then it begs the question, why not sign a forward now rather than next season? Just seems like delaying a decision and not very forward thinking.

I’m holding out hope we’ll get Brewster on a permanent deal with an agreement Liverpool have first option.

Let’s see what happens. Fans forum tomorrow I believe. So something may happen today or tomorrow.

This.

If Brewster comes in on loan, I’d want him as backup to Connolly (who needs development minutes) and Maupay of course (who he’d be back up to anyway).

If we sign him permanently, I’m not bothered about him grabbing Connolly’s development time.

As you say, the next 32hrs or so should be exciting. I’ve just got a hunch that the club have at least one rabbit in the hutch that they’re going to release to fans for a ruddy good stroke.

 

[severnside gull]

As you say, the next 32hrs or so should be exciting. I’ve just got a hunch that the club have at least one rabbit in the hutch that they’re going to release to fans for a ruddy good stroke.

Historically I’m not sure that happens although we say it every year

 

[Marshy]

This.

If Brewster comes in on loan, I’d want him as backup to Connolly (who needs development minutes) and Maupay of course (who he’d be back up to anyway).

If we sign him permanently, I’m not bothered about him grabbing Connolly’s development time.

As you say, the next 32hrs or so should be exciting. I’ve just got a hunch that the club have at least one rabbit in the hutch that they’re going to release to fans for a ruddy good stroke.

if as looks likely we play 3 5 2 , Maupay, Connolly and whoever else we get in will get plenty of game time.

 

[Icy Gull]

I could get very excited about this but I’m not going to! I am scarred by too many striker disappointments

 

[GT49er]

If Brewster comes in on loan, I’d want him as backup to Connolly (who needs development minutes) and Maupay of course (who he’d be back up to anyway).

In which case Liverpool wouldn't lend him!

 

[zefarelly]

I know some people don't like the idea of having Brewster potentially on loan, but for me football is largely all about the here and now. If he came on loan and did a good job (ultimately aiding his development for Liverpool) I have no problem with that. We would just then next summer need to look again for another forward.

It seems almost every summer we're looking for a striker in one way or another, so whether Brewster came on loan or permanently I wouldn't mind. Plus, if it was a loan and didn't work out we're not stuck with a player who wasn't that successful. In hindsight I wished the deals to bring Ali J and Locadia had been loans, then at least we could have sent them back!

Not sure about Wilson though.

In addition to this, If we had him pon loan and he went back, BUT we had a good season finishing 10-12th for example, it makes us a more promising prospect for the next signing, strikers like F1 drivers have egos . . . .

 

[Whitechapel]

Bournemouth fans hated Wilson, despite his goals. Wouldn’t touch him.

 

[Jim D]

In addition to this, If we had him pon loan and he went back, BUT we had a good season finishing 10-12th for example, it makes us a more promising prospect for the next signing, strikers like F1 drivers have egos . . . .

Yes, but if he had a very good season, scoring 12 goals, and Liverpool asked for him back, would we then launch a campaign to 'free' him?

 

[Insel affe]

Yes, but if he had a very good season, scoring 12 goals, and Liverpool asked for him back, would we then launch a campaign to 'free' him?

Course not, we are Brighton, we would meekly shrug our shoulders and pop and NSC and moan about Brext, Covid and why we did not SIGN a striker

 

[blue-shifted]

Liverpool, are up for selling with a buy back clause according to reports

 

[super-seagulls]

You’re right.

Although, like a lot of Bournemouth players, he was a bit shitehouse last season and failed to make the staring 11 on a number of occasions.

If Ajax are going to give us good money for Jahanbakhsh, it makes sense to bring in this guy.

https://youtu.be/WPW9dwVkp2Y

He is faster than Ali-J, left footed and has an eye for goal. He can score direct free kicks and is a threat from shooting outside the box.

How many players do we currently have who you’d back to score from outside the box? Not a lot.

Him and Rhian would give us an excellent chance of top 10.

But can he score a bicycle?

 

[chaileyjem]

There is some credible reporting that we are interested in Brewster
(https://twitter.com/AndyNaylorBHAFC/status/1299237502172246016)
but that twitter account referred a few posts back is total nonsense/speculation as a cursory look will confirm.

 

[Not Andy Naylor]

Liverpool, are up for selling with a buy back clause according to reports

The problem there is that if he does well we can't keep him and if he's terrible we're stuck with him!

 

[super-seagulls]

The problem there is that if he does well we can't keep him and if he's terrible we're stuck with him!

I imagine there would be significant profit in the buy-back, wouldn’t there?