Would Wilson be more suited to the position that Mooy was forced into?
That is pretty persuasive.At first I wasn't sure about loaning, but the more I think about it, the more sense it makes.
For this summer only, we could save a hefty outlay, which we may not have due to covid related losses.
Any striker we sign carries an inherent risk, as we know from experience. Loaning mitigates the risk in these uncertain times.
By saving money on a striker we might then perhaps push the boat out a little further in other, less risky areas. This too will mitigate risk as we avoid the old trap of 'buy cheap buy twice'.
We could then spend maybe 50% more on a top quality defensive midfielder, someone who would be a safer investment than a punt on a young striker with no Premier League experience.
And who knows, next summer Liverpool may want to sell and we'd be in pole position to make the deal permanent.
Klopp was planning to keep him around for pre-season so maybe an option late in the window if we don’t secure our perm targets
I would be very happy with Brewster on loan (or permanent) and Wilson on a permanent transfer too.
Wilson is an upgrade on any wide player we currently have.
Brewster has huge potential.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good points.The other moving part here is Andone. Yes, yes he's injured, yes, he got himself sent off to force a move which under normal circumstances isn't forgiveable. These aren't normal circumstances now and getting him another club before he's proved his fitness won't be easy. I wonder if the club are thinking, the back up plan to not landing a Nunez type, is to get through with what we've got to whenever Florin is back, no idea when, maybe xmas, then see if it's possible to re-integrate.
A loan for Brewster makes sense if we can’t afford to spend or take the risk on spending £30m on a striker right now.
Spending £20m on Wilson makes less sense, he didn’t have a great season and he looks no better than Trossard and we have Lallana now so why bother? Unless we plan to sell Gross.