Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Reviewing Red Card Decision



studio150

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2011
30,227
On the Border
that still shouldnt need such a long review from an experienced, professional referee. its an obvious push (which dozens occur and ignored), obvious handball (under new ridiculous interpretation). a decision shouldnt be taking more than 30sec, if it does they should just defer back to what ever the ref thinks and continue. trying to get every damn decision "right" is ruining the game, and they still arent always getting it "right", so its an utter fail.

I was saying that yesterday after seeing the 83rd replay of the handball incident and also wondering if they could borrow sicko from cricket to see if there was any contact.

But the main thing should be if it's not clear after 30 seconds then the game moves on with the original on field decision
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,538
Deepest, darkest Sussex
It seems obvious to me to put the name of the player being investigated on the screen (e.g. "Red Card - Neal Maupay") which at least gives everyone an idea. When it happened on Saturday a lot of us in WSL thought it was for a handball by a Norwich player denying the ball crossing the line.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here