ATFC Seagull
Aberystwyth Town FC
So what is the extra level of burden of proof you would introduce for the death penalty?If there was reasonable doubt then you wouldn't be there.
Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk
So what is the extra level of burden of proof you would introduce for the death penalty?If there was reasonable doubt then you wouldn't be there.
So what is the extra level of burden of proof you would introduce for the death penalty?
Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk
But you just said that all those convicted should be beyond reasonable doubt?Being caught red handed or being beyond reasonable doubt.
But then you're creating tiers of guilt. If I was doing life but was not deemed to be proven guilty enough for the death penalty, then I'd question how I'm guilty enough to be in prison.
Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
Tiers re levels of crime and tiers re level of punishment. Don't see why there have to be tiers of guilt?
But then you're creating tiers of guilt. If I was doing life but was not deemed to be proven guilty enough for the death penalty, then I'd question how I'm guilty enough to be in prison.
Being caught red handed or being beyond reasonable doubt.
That's not what is being discussed though. It's this idea of "I'd introduce it but only for people that are definitely guilty".its not tiers of guilt but a reflection of the severity, heinousness of the crime. we already do this, one burglar gets community service, another gets 5 years, another might get 15.
I'm sorry but this post is paranoid radical nonsense.
Can you name a single example of something that has gone "from ridiculous, to normal, to demanded" in this country?
Boris Johnson the dictator... or Dear Leader Johnson if you like.... now I've heard everything
Is this really a discussion?
Wow. Sad times.
Can someone just tell me, putting aside matters of war or self-defence, is it wrong to take another person’s life?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk