terryberry1
Well-known member
Guilty.... Not Guilty..... Don't really care. I would still want him appointed England manager this week.
I agree his argument that with all his money why would he dodge 30k, well the simple answer is because people that have money are greedy fuckers and just because you have a few quid your not going to avoid a relatively small tax bill is bollox, has to be more to this but they can't prove it.
Your missing the point. Capello is not f***ing English.
Your missing the point. Capello is not f***ing English.
Isn't it generally the case that the richest amongst us pay proportionately the least taxes anyway, because they can afford to pay top accountants to weasel the system. Therefore they clearly DO care about taxes. Personally, if someone offered to save me £30,000 in tax, I think I'd be saying yes no matter how rich I was (legally, of course).
Oh yeah of course but it would still make you a greedy fucker.
Tefal were the first to use teflon as a non stick coating. However i suspect the Pompey fan just got confused as I'd doubt he would know that.
That's true, what's Capello ever achieved?
Get the Sandbanks man-motivator-supreme in on £6m per year(through PAYE), will almost guarantee Euro & WC finals at least.
Will turn his relative Frank, Lescott, Baines, Bent ... into world beaters for sure.
Let him go free. Get him in the England hot seat now and tell that Italian twat to finally f*** off and return to being the postman he truly is!
Of course
My point being that you don't get to be as rich as Harry if you don't worry about the occasional £30,000.
Of course
My point being that you don't get to be as rich as Harry if you don't worry about the occasional £30,000.
So are all Italians postmen?
For me, he's guilty. Apparently they weeded Spurs fans off the jury, so he shouldn't gain any advantage from that, and the way it's been painted in the media he has no defence besides 'I'm a bit thick guv, honest'.
I think that's where the Judge's summing up was going.
HMRC has a real torrid relationship with Football given the way clubs seem quite able to avoid paying them whenever they feel like it and if this goes against them then I wonder where they will focus next?
Would be nice (given that they're chasing £30k from Redknapp) to think they'd go after the millions owed to them- and us- by one of his old clubs
On top of this, wasn't there a suggestion that in fact his accounts are dodgy as shit, and in fact HMRC have simply picked the most cast iron case that they had. I wonder whether, if he's found guilty, they'll use it as an excuse to get forensic accountants in and try to pin some more on him.
For me, he's guilty. Apparently they weeded Spurs fans off the jury, so he shouldn't gain any advantage from that, and the way it's been painted in the media he has no defence besides 'I'm a bit thick guv, honest'.
Ken Dodd used the same defence and got away with it.
HMRC has a real torrid relationship with Football given the way clubs seem quite able to avoid paying them whenever they feel like it and if this goes against them then I wonder where they will focus next?