Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Reading sign Brooker







b.w.2.

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2004
5,189
Not happy... Brooker is better than Jones by a country mile, and some people on here far too negative about him... :(
 


Jameson

Active member
Good for Brooker - he was hardly gona come back here - like Withdean? Come on.

I think he will do well at Reading. As long as he plays crap against us of course.

Speaking to a Leicester fan recently he could not believe Brooker is 28 - he thought he was a youngster coming up through the ranks!! Same fan was v. critical of Adam's signings at Leicester - quoted 20 player bought all of which (were crap) have since moved on......???
 


Wilts

New member
Jul 5, 2003
1,772
Bournemouth/Reading
Brooker is miles better than Salako. And Coppell says that he has been signed as a possibility for both wings as "he can provide competition for Glen Little on the right". So he would say that unless he had a left winger still planned to sign up.

Brooker is cover, and good cover at that... so I'm happy. And we do have money to spend, because Coventry announced that we bid for Davenport, so I reckon there's about 2/3 signings left before the season begins. Not bad at all considering they've all been freebies so far!

See you on the opening day! :wave:
 


dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
According to most of the bods on the Reading hobknob,Brooker
isn't good enough for you.
I don't know what's worse on there, the homophobic typecasting
or the atrocious spelling. When I come out of there I feel like I
need to wipe my boots. :nono:
 




dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
It was meant to be.:lolol:
 




Kryten

New member
Dec 20, 2003
2,360
Here, there and every where
RoyalAli said:
Is it because we're the club you're hoping to be when you get Falmer?

no, because, you sign Brighton players, existing, ex, or ones we are chasing, have a hypocrit as a chairman, and are a tin pot club

Good enough reason for you?

Albion Rob said:
No, it's because their fans seem to spend a large percentage of their time on a BRIGHTON message board discussing READING.


It's because they want to speak to real fans
 
Last edited:




dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
RoyalAli said:
well for a start, your spelling of Hobnob was wrong...
:shootself



A comma between start and your :nono:
 




Kryten

New member
Dec 20, 2003
2,360
Here, there and every where
RoyalAli said:
Me and Wilts are regulars, Platypus has been on here as well.

Dougdeep, Thimble Keegan, Championes, Lord Bracknell, BHA jim, Looney, Harry_connickJR, Albion Daz, Barkshire Seagull have been using HNA.

I think that says it all.

and Dougdeep, there is a comma between start in your because it is still grammatically correct, as it also is without a comma.


how does that say it all? if i recall, weren't some of them spamming it the other day?

RoyalAli said:
Me and Wilts are regulars, Platypus has been on here as well.

I have no problem with them, but you.....
 
Last edited:




Kryten

New member
Dec 20, 2003
2,360
Here, there and every where
RoyalAli said:
Only a few of us Reading fans use NSC, but loads of you have camped onto HNA.


and why did you just completely ignore my previous post?


if you love it so much, why don't you stay there, with people who give a damn?


edited for the sake of it :jester: to annoy royal sally:dunce:
 
Last edited:


dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
RoyalAli said:
Only a few of us Reading fans use NSC, but loads of you have camped onto HNA.




Camped onto?.Is that a homophobic comment?.:ohmy:
 






dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
Thats better,I have been somewhere really quiet.It was called
madstadchat. There was nobody else there.:lolol:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here