Perhaps the Argus should look up the meaning of fuming.Perhaps FC Zurich should look up the meaning of ''amateurish''
Perhaps the Argus should look up the meaning of fuming.Perhaps FC Zurich should look up the meaning of ''amateurish''
Perhaps the Argus should look up the meaning of fuming.
Fuming "feel, show, or express great anger.
"he is fuming over the interference in his work"
synonyms: be furious, be enraged, be angry, seethe, smoulder, simmer, boil, be livid"
What's fair enough, the Argus suggesting that the club are fuming, or me highlighting their shit work?Seems fair enough.
It's an amazing coincidence that all these people who stand to make an absolute fortune out of Dwamena think his heart condition is no problem at all. Much better placed to judge than a Cardiac Consultant with no vested interest.
What's fair enough, the Argus suggesting that the club are fuming, or me highlighting their shit work?
They say the Albion are fuming (great anger, from the definition you provided), and then go on to say that the Albion haven't actually said anything, but the Argus understands they're shocked and concerned. How is shocked and concerned (which itself is only hearsay) great anger?The Argus' use of the word 'fuming'. They seem to understand its meaning perfectly well.
They say the Albion are fuming (great anger, from the definition you provided), and then go on to say that the Albion haven't actually said anything, but the Argus understands they're shocked and concerned. How is shocked and concerned (which itself is only hearsay) great anger?
See synonyms........be angry, seethe, smoulder, simmer. Can't see your problem to be honest.They say the Albion are fuming (great anger, from the definition you provided), and then go on to say that the Albion haven't actually said anything, but the Argus understands they're shocked and concerned. How is shocked and concerned (which itself is only hearsay) great anger?
Nope I simply saw the headline and then read the article to find out that the headline was a load of crap. I'd say the same of any paper doing the same.Bloody hell, you are manically desperate to criticise the Argus, aren't you?
Since the club haven't commented about Zurich's accusation, then what else would you call it?How do you know it's only hearsay?
Exactly. That's what's amateurish. If they had said up front about whatever the condition is, we could have made a judgement then, rather than give the player false hope.FC Zurich were aware of a problem but did not think it too serious. They should have informed Brighton about this
Given that the first one, Neto, went on to have knee surgery, then no, we're not being too cautious.Are we being over zealous ? too cautious ? concerned about our insurance policies ? Either way it seems strange that we have had two serious medical failures this year.
Are we being over zealous ? too cautious ? concerned about our insurance policies ?
Given that the first one, Neto, went on to have knee surgery, then no, we're not being too cautious.
Indeed, we'll (fans) continue to watch what happens with Dwamena. Surely we could have given the results of the tests to Zurich and they could have had experts look at them that day. The fact that he's still not available suggests there's more to it than Zurich are admitting.You could add that Ralph hasn't been released for international duty, as they conduct further checks