Yeah, and you sound like him.
It really is absolutely hilarious reading how some muppets are actually defending this.
But we're going round and round in circles. Quite clearly, either the pricing or the Ts & Cs are completely and utterly ridiculous. Still, BobCrow Hut is insistent that his members were only doing what they were told to do and protecting revenue for his members at the same time. It doesn't matter that customer service is non existent and common sense has not been applied.
Third world and VILLAGE.
I doubt it. Your normal course of action is to whinge and whine when you don't get your own way isn't it?Give me strength, I'll organise a strike next - you CAUC
Ok, consider this example. Often in the shops you'll find, say, a 1.5L bottle of Volvic on special offer at £1. The 500ml bottles are not on offer and are at their normal price of £1.10. If you take a 500ml bottle to the till, what do you expect to be charged?
Because they purchased a cheap ticket with Ts & Cs that they broke therefore liable to a fine if caught.
Quite clearly, either the pricing or the Ts & Cs are completely and utterly ridiculous.
What has that got to do with it? Easy explained it perfectly.
I doubt it. Your normal course of action is to whinge and whine when you don't get your own way isn't it?
They didn't BREAK the journey. They TERMINATED it.
If they'd tried to get on another train later to complete the journey with that ticket then fine, throw the book at them. But to fine them just for getting off early is utterly INSANE.
I'd have gone nuts. Absolutely nuts, and probably ended up being arrested.
BobCrow Hut will ignore this simple fact and simply continue with his "contract was broken" drivel, as if we're not actually aware of that fact.We know they are liable for a fine. The issue is with the ridiculous T&Cs. Would you still defend these people if somewhere in the T&Cs it said you had to balance a ham sandwich on your head at all times during the journey? Hopefully not. In the same way balancing a ham sandwich on the head is deemed ridiculous....a number of people also think not allowing passengers to jump off the train early is ridiculous. Hopefully you can see the link here, and bridge this further and grasp the main gripe on this thread.
I am going to bed now, hopefully the sound of the penny dropping will not wake me up.
It's exactly the same thing. You're offered a certain price for a certain amount of water, it doesn't mean they'll give you less for the same price.
I'm not saying it makes sense.
Priceless. I'm defending the decision of a passenger to get off his train two stops early without being fined.Not at all, you are by defending something you know very little about and then making assumptions that are wrong, but carry on making a CAUC of yourself
Ok, consider this example. Often in the shops you'll find, say, a 1.5L bottle of Volvic on special offer at £1. The 500ml bottles are not on offer and are at their normal price of £1.10. If you take a 500ml bottle to the till, what do you expect to be charged?
well if you're going to take that comparison to its logical conclusion, it's like then buying the 1.5l bottle, then subsequently being charged extra for not drinking all of the water.
It's exactly the same thing. You're offered a certain price for a certain amount of water, it doesn't mean they'll give you less for the same price.
I'm not saying it makes sense.
Yes that is perfectly fair and completely different to the situation we're arguing about.This situation is something like what happened to me recently. I purchased an advance purchase single ticket for the 11:17 Victoria to Eastbourne train for around £8. I decided to leave the train at Lewes as a mate of mine asked if I wanted to go for a pint. After a few pints of Harveys I went back to the station and there were some ticket inspectors on the station entrance where the car park is. They told me that I would have to purchase a new ticket as this ticket was only valid on the 11:17 train from Victoria to Eastbourne and on THAT train only. They also said that strictly speaking I should have continued on that train to Eastbourne and not left the train at Lewes. I had to pay again to get to Eastbourne, fair dos I say. Even with the single from Lewes to Eastbourne I still think its a fair deal. Rules are rules I guess?