jackalbion
Well-known member
- Aug 30, 2011
- 4,913
Yes that would have helped but you’ve also got to take into account that the people have control over these things are complete morons and just do illogical things because it saves 20p in the short term. The problem is they started implementing the process to head towards the GB Rail model, which while wasn’t perfect certainly would have helped sort out the mess we currently have, instead we have a new administration in Number 10 who has decided not to continue forward with it. So we have a half finished job which if it carries on will spiral and we will just have, what it basically is now, a completely non functioning railway system. The system needs investment, and that investment is never coming. I mean the trains on the Seaford services were first in service in 1976, and the government have no interest in funding the ROSCOs to get more modern stock to lease to the new operators, it’s just a completely mental broken system.So, with fares in mind, is "peak" really the peak now?
We left early to get to Charlton (for obvious reasons ). The 14.13 from Portslade to Brighton (started at Southampton) was absolutely rammed. My son even said he was surprised a local train was that busy in early afternoon. The 14.44 Thameslink was similarly rammed by Three Bridges. And the last two trains back from London Bridge and Vic were also busy. On the other hand I've always easily got a seat coming home from my office when I've worked in London, with the train only really busy between Clapham and East Croydon.
Would it not have made sense to have flexed the rise rather than applying 5.9% across the board, putting more on "off peak" leisure fares but holding monthly and annual STs and applying a far lower rate to morning peak tickets? People back in offices would certainly help businesses in The City and towns like Brighton and Haywards Heath.