I just don't know where it starts and stops, where are the boundaries
If you do not know where the boundary lies do not try and find out. That said, most people seem capable of staying on the right side.
I just don't know where it starts and stops, where are the boundaries
They seem to deal with these cases very quickly. The ones which I read in the papers seem to be done and dusted within a few weeks.
A fair comment, but a lot of me thinks if you act a complete bellend you stand a chance of being unlucky one day. There is a very clear message here.
Yes, burgle houses and in some cases, download childporn, with f***ing impunity, you wont get any time
Yes, burgle houses and in some cases, download childporn, with f***ing impunity, you wont get any time, we'd rather waste resources on locking up a fool who didnt physically harm anyone but made a prick of himself by posting racist comments on a social media site .
I'm all for judges having some latitude in sentencing, but this is basically sending out the message that racism , albeit electronically , is a more serious crime than burglary, or in some cases posession of child porn, or carrying a knife.........it's not, its an attempt to appease a vociferous minority, whilst we sweep various other ills and wrongdoings under the carpet.You have a point, and I agree with your sentiment. But, if I went into a pub and acted a cock and had my face punched in for my troubles few would feel sorry for me. Same as this guy. He acted a cock and he was very unlucky. Dont be a bellend.
Then the years of precedent are clearly wrong, and I dont need to be a member of the bar to know that.The difference between burglary cases and this specific case is that there are years of precendent around burglary cases. Social media is a relatively new phenomenon, so the judge is clearly setting a harsh precednet early. Clearly the right thing to do.
You have a point, and I agree with your sentiment. But, if I went into a pub and acted a cock and had my face punched in for my troubles few would feel sorry for me. Same as this guy. He acted a cock and he was very unlucky. Dont be a bellend.
......it's not, its an attempt to appease a vociferous minority, whilst we sweep various other ills and wrongdoings under the carpet.
How unserious do you think criminal racism is?I'm all for judges having some latitude in sentencing, but this is basically sending out the message that racism , albeit electronically , is a more serious crime than burglary, or in some cases posession of child porn, or carrying a knife.........it's not, its an attempt to appease a vociferous minority, whilst we sweep various other ills and wrongdoings under the carpet.
I'm all for judges having some latitude in sentencing, but this is basically sending out the message that racism , albeit electronically , is a more serious crime than burglary, or in some cases posession of child porn, or carrying a knife.........it's not, its an attempt to appease a vociferous minority, whilst we sweep various other ills and wrongdoings under the carpet.
If you've read his previous posts you'll know the answer to your question, LBHow unserious do you think criminal racism is?
With respect, if someone called you a niggerloving cocksucker on NSC, we would take action.
I'm all for judges having some latitude in sentencing, but this is basically sending out the message that racism , albeit electronically , is a more serious crime than burglary, or in some cases posession of child porn, or carrying a knife.........it's not, its an attempt to appease a vociferous minority, whilst we sweep various other ills and wrongdoings under the carpet.
Obviously nowhere near as serious as the offences i mentioned , as I posted on this thread previously, why is this treated so seriously , when other acts, such as burning poppies and causing a breach of the peace by abusing homecoming soldiers are treated with what a majority of people would surely regard as astonishing leniency ? I also wonder why the subject of this thread attracts such vitriol from the left leaning posters on here , when they had virtually nothing to say about the poppy burners .How unserious do you think criminal racism is?
Then the years of precedent are clearly wrong, and I dont need to be a member of the bar to know that.
Obviously nowhere near as serious as the offences i mentioned , as I posted on this thread previously, why is this treated so seriously , when other acts, such as burning poppies and causing a breach of the peace by abusing homecoming soldiers are treated with what a majority of people would surely regard as astonishing leniency ? I also wonder why the subject of this thread attracts such vitriol from the left leaning posters on here , when they had virtually nothing to say about the poppy burners .