She’s from Essex so I’m guessing West Ham are favourites?Do it and support the Albion instead...
Mason Greenwood: TV presenter Rachel Riley says she'll stop supporting Man Utd if forward stays
Television presenter Rachel Riley says she will stop supporting Manchester United if forward Mason Greenwood stays at the club.www.bbc.co.uk
Giggs wasn't charged with violence against women during his career at ManU.didnt say all this about Giggs did she.
Attention seeker
Did you see the video - she’s doing the right thing, we need to support her and all those that challenge that animaldidnt say all this about Giggs did she.
Attention seeker
Vile woman who just happens to be tight in this case.Love Rachel , she’s not afraid to tell it like it is and she’s always right .
The case WAS dropped.If the case was dropped then he didn;t do it or am I missing something?
The case WAS dropped.
Not provable does not equal innocence (copywrite Jay Rod)If the case was dropped then he didn;t do it or am I missing something?
The case was dropped because witnesses withdrew. It's possible he did do it and the evidence just isn't available to make a prosecution viable. Or it's possible the witnesses dropped out because they weren't willing to go through with testifying as they don't believe he actually did what he was accused of. We'll likely never know for sure either way. I don't personally know enough about the case to form my own opinion. Riley has clearly made her mind up that he's guilty, and she's entitled to that opinion.If the case was dropped then he didn;t do it or am I missing something?
Not convinced about that at all. Seems they were about to announce his return but a journo got hold of it and tried to validate the news.......The case was dropped because witnesses withdrew. It's possible he did do it and the evidence just isn't available to make a prosecution viable. Or it's possible the witnesses dropped out because they weren't willing to go through with testifying as they don't believe he actually did what he was accused of. We'll likely never know for sure either way. I don't personally know enough about the case to form my own opinion. Riley has clearly made her mind up that he's guilty, and she's entitled to that opinion.
It sounds like Man U are going through a very thorough process in deciding what they do. But even after they announce their decision we won't be any the wiser - because they'll be looking not just at whether Greenwood is "guilty" but also at the internal cohesion (would club staff / players be comfortable with keeping him?), PR (will external stories about keeping him be damaging?), and commercial (is there a risk of sponsors withdrawing?) angles.
IF he's innocent, he's now in a horrible position - his career is probably gone in terms of top-level football, and the accusations will follow him for the rest of his life. There really ought to be a route for people who are accused, who then don't face trial, to request and get some form of "trial-like" hearing to attempt to establish their innocence.
Yes. Because Rachel Riley, one of the most beautiful, highest paid people on telly is craving your attention.didnt say all this about Giggs did she.
Attention seeker
Christ alive, did you not see all of the evidence? It's not just accusations. The only reason the case was dropped was because a "key witness" dropped out. Under 1% of reported rapes lead to convictions in this country. This is the result of a criminal justice system that makes prosecuting rape extremely rare, lengthy and difficult. Not guilty, not proven, whatever - it doesn't equate to the truth, which is more visible in this case than any other in football.The case was dropped because witnesses withdrew. It's possible he did do it and the evidence just isn't available to make a prosecution viable. Or it's possible the witnesses dropped out because they weren't willing to go through with testifying as they don't believe he actually did what he was accused of. We'll likely never know for sure either way. I don't personally know enough about the case to form my own opinion. Riley has clearly made her mind up that he's guilty, and she's entitled to that opinion.
It sounds like Man U are going through a very thorough process in deciding what they do. But even after they announce their decision we won't be any the wiser - because they'll be looking not just at whether Greenwood is "guilty" but also at the internal cohesion (would club staff / players be comfortable with keeping him?), PR (will external stories about keeping him be damaging?), and commercial (is there a risk of sponsors withdrawing?) angles.
IF he's innocent, he's now in a horrible position - his career is probably gone in terms of top-level football, and the accusations will follow him for the rest of his life. There really ought to be a route for people who are accused, who then don't face trial, to request and get some form of "trial-like" hearing to attempt to establish their innocence.
Man U twitter is a sight to behold.........vitriolic dismissing of anyone who says he shouldn't be returningChrist alive, did you not see all of the evidence? It's not just accusations. The only reason the case was dropped was because a "key witness" dropped out. Under 1% of reported rapes lead to convictions in this country. This is the result of a criminal justice system that makes prosecuting rape extremely rare, lengthy and difficult. Not guilty, not proven, whatever - it doesn't equate to the truth, which is more visible in this case than any other in football.
It's an utterly abominable situation, and I just can't believe any sane football fan would be defending him.