Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

R.I.P. The Jungle



alfredmizen

Banned
Mar 11, 2015
6,342
I would be much happier taking women and genuine child refugees, lest we end up like this.

Seven of the nine ISIS jihadis who launched a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris last November entered Europe by posing as refugees.
The attackers were part of a group of 14 who plotted their way into Western Europe by riding the wave of the migrant crisis last year, according to Hungarian security officials.
By using fake Syrian passports, many of the attackers, already on European terror watch-lists, were able to slip back into Europe undetected, along with thousands of other refugees.
http://www.foreigndesknews.com/lisas-desk/majority-paris-attackers-entered-europe-posing-refugees/
I know a copper who has been there , he described it as being like a high security prison without the warders, his words "you really wouldn't want them living next door to you".
 








heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,868
Sweden has certainly taken their fair share of migrants and is enjoying the benefits of cultural enrichment .

[yt]sdGPPLmR5Bc[/YT]
I won't watch your linked video.... but I can tell you it doesn't and isn't working in Sweden..... in fact many of said refugees have already either left or are planning to head elsewhere... you cannot easily mix northern European culture with middle eastern or African culture....

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
 


pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
I'm hesitant to call it a downside because I don't think helping fellow human beings is necessarily an act that has a downside but there would obviously be strain on resources etc. but I don't think that means we shouldn't try and accommodate some, not all, of these people.

What riles me up is the assumption, and I'm not pointing the finger at you here; more at a section of our populace, that these people are criminals / rapists / terrorists / all around bad hombres (to quote The Great Orange) and that we should turn them all away indiscriminately. There are some undesirables, there always is, and they exist within the native population as well. It doesn't make us all bad and it doesn't make all the inhabitants of the Jungle bad either. And again I appreciate that most of the people in favour of restricted or an outright ban on immigration are in favour of it because of space / resource worries and not because of assumed criminality.

Immigration is a cornerstone of the foundation of this country, and many others. Were it not for immigration I wouldn't be here, nor would my mother, my girlfriend, at least six of my friends, many colleagues.

As an aside, apologies if I came across as rude or condescending with my posts yesterday. It was unintentional.

Its not a downside the Lily Allen types like to acknowledge with their lofty moral positions.
But there is a downside to helping those that have crossed the med and many countries before applying for asylum,you encourage more to do it, and more to drown.

you might as well have pushed their heads underwater and drowned them yourself.
im sure people like her give their hands a good wash before they go to bed.

we should be giving priority to the most vulnerable, they are in UN camps near the conflicts not walking across Europe.
 




D

Deleted member 22389

Guest
All that will happen is everyone will now head to Dunkirk, and that will become the new Calais. French authorities should have secured their borders years ago, but because of Schengen and every country being effectively borderless people have crossed unrestricted for years now. Migration is not going away and wherever people end up, it will just end up creating more cultural and religious tensions. We are seeing it now, look at Sweden, Germany, France, Italy and that is just the start. Until these governments wake up, nothing is going to change. Yes we have the land mass to take everyone outside the EU, but we simply don't have the resources, or the money to deal with it.

Some might find the Australian way awful, but they know it is never going to work having an open border.
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
This is just political mumbo jumbo, we have probably some of the most generous financial support for our own displaced children yet still require more care, more facilites and staff which might make their own lives a little easier.

At what point do you take resources from them and give them to other migrants and when is your own threshold met, we all know there are millions of children throughout the world blighted by war, famine and disease, at what level do you put a migrant in France whatever their age ahead of say other displaced children from say Africa, India, Syria ?

What is your limit and how do you possibly choose before saying 'no sorry', unfettered movement of peoples cannot be the answer its simply unsustainable and inherently unfair.

I'd just like people that say we should 'look after our own' to show some commitment to that, outside of using it as a stick to bash brown people with. That's all.

I wouldn't argue against "unfettered movement of peoples" being unsustainable, it's a pretty self-evident, obvious statement. It's not really the same debate though. I'm fed of of people saying it's EITHER/ OR, it's not.

And out of interest 'look after our own' seems a very vague, ever shifting concept. Talking specifics, what does it actually mean?
 
Last edited:






Insel affe

HellBilly
Feb 23, 2009
24,361
Brighton factually.....
Fires have broken out across the 'Jungle' in Calais as the police operation to clear out the camp entered its third day.
A plume of black smoke billowed over the camp as firefighters battled the flames in shelters, tents and small shops.

Dozens of large blazes were ripping through what had been until recently the homes of thousands of migrants and refugees at the sprawling French camp.
The sound of exploding gas canisters could be heard as firefighters tried to tackle the flames.

Riot police move in as fire spreads through the Jungle
Four migrants have been arrested in connection with starting the blazes, said Calais police commissioner Patrick Visser-Bourdon, who is in charge of the dismantling operation.

Earlier, regional prefect Fabienne Buccio said migrants "have a tradition" of burning their shelters before leaving.

How nice, can't wait for them to reach British shores.... Not
 




rocker959

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2011
2,802
Plovdiv Bulgaria
The Russian's could have obliterated the camp as they passed by the other day with a few salvos of target practice . Missed opportunity. Stated in jest .
 




neilbard

Hedging up
Oct 8, 2013
6,280
I've just checked. Last year 28 countries had more registered refugees. In 2014 27 countries had more. In 2013 it was 20.

We were 59th in the list of refugees per 1000 inhabitants in mid-2015.

This is according to UNHCR data via wiki - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_refugee_population

There is some more info here if you want some 'actual figures'. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics

The figures are disproportionate compared to other nations.

http://data.mongabay.com/igapo/world_statistics_by_area.htm
 








D

Deleted member 22389

Guest
Disproportionate in terms of what?

Think about this way, the US has a population of about 330 million
The UK has a population of about 70 million. You can fit the UK in to the US about 30 times, I think if anything that shows how over populated we are.

Yes we have lots of land but do we want more green built on. Quality of life.

This country has done more than enough over the years. We only get told about now, and not about the hundreds of thousands of people who have illegally entered this country over the last 15-20 years. It's why I can no longer listen to anyone from the Labour Party when they keep telling us that we need to do more. They lost complete control of our borders, and if it wasn't for them making a complete cock up of things, public opinion about immigration might be a whole lot different today.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
20,757
Eastbourne
Think about this way, the US has a population of about 330 million
The UK has a population of about 70 million. You can fit the UK in to the US about 30 times, I think if anything that shows how over populated we are.

Yes we have lots of land but do we want more green built on. Quality of life.

This country has done more than enough over the years. We only get told about now, and not about the hundreds of thousands of people who have illegally entered this country over the last 15-20 years. It's why I can no longer listen to anyone from the Labour Party when they keep telling us that we need to do more. They lost complete control of our borders, and if it wasn't for them making a complete cock up of things, public opinion about immigration might be a whole lot different today.

Absolutely right. Labour fuelled the demands for a referendum. It's funny to see socialists venting about Cameron calling the referendum but failing to see that one of the main dissatisfactions that led to it was Labour's misguided policy of open door immigration in the vain hope it would translate to more left wing votes.
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,913
Almería
Land mass and population density

What about economic factors? And infrastructure? Kazakhstan is massive and practically empty but I don't think they'd be able to cope with a million refugees.

Canada is huge and wealthy but I don't think we can drop a bunch of refugees on the Arctic tundra,

What percentage of refugees should we take?

Think about this way, the US has a population of about 330 million
The UK has a population of about 70 million. You can fit the UK in to the US about 30 times, I think if anything that shows how over populated we are.

Yes we have lots of land but do we want more green built on. Quality of life.

This country has done more than enough over the years. We only get told about now, and not about the hundreds of thousands of people who have illegally entered this country over the last 15-20 years. It's why I can no longer listen to anyone from the Labour Party when they keep telling us that we need to do more. They lost complete control of our borders, and if it wasn't for them making a complete cock up of things, public opinion about immigration might be a whole lot different today.

The US should undoubtedly do more in terms of refugees.

I think we're getting our wires crossed here though. Neil Bard and I were talking about refugees, not immigration as a whole.
 
Last edited:


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,913
Almería
Absolutely right. Labour fuelled the demands for a referendum. It's funny to see socialists venting about Cameron calling the referendum but failing to see that one of the main dissatisfactions that led to it was Labour's misguided policy of open door immigration in the vain hope it would translate to more left wing votes.

And the leave campaign successfully exploited peoples concerns about migration even though the architect of the campaign is pro-free movement.
 




D

Deleted member 22389

Guest
What about economic factors?

What percentage of refugees should we take?



The US should undoubtedly do more in terms of refugees.

I think we're getting our wires crossed here though. Neil Bard and I were talking about refugees, not immigration as a whole.

I wasn't talking about immigration as a whole, I was talking about the numbers of Asylum Seekers, Economic Migrants who are now the new Refugees that are already in our country.

Don't know where I read it, but they reckon we have around 300,000 - 400,000 living in this country illegally. Says to me we have already done our part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,913
Almería
I wasn't talking about immigration as a whole, I was talking about the numbers of Asylum Seekers, Economic Migrants who are now the new Refugees that are already in our country.

Don't know where I read it, but they reckon we have around 300,000 - 400,000 living in this country illegally. Says to me we have already done our part.

Discounting asylum seekers and economic migrants, what are we left with?

The ones who come for the weather?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here