Gazwag
5 millionth post poster
So its two points for a win then?
We had three at 1-2 we now have one at 2-2 so three minus one is two.
So its two points for a win then?
So its two points for a win then?
I'm not sticking up for dunk just pointing out that if again our defender had stayed on his feet for their first then they wouldn't of scored. This is elementary defending again. Stay on their bloody feet.
We had three at 1-2 we now have one at 2-2 so three minus one is two.
We had three at 1-2 we now have one at 2-2 so three minus one is two.
I would prefer 12 wins 7 draws and 2 defeats
Could you explain it in simpler terms please
OK Dunk is a complete Wanker!!! Howzat
I've noticed your posts re his ability ..so not necessary to repeat ...yur maths however is a tad suspect
My maths is shite! 3 points 2 points we ****ed it up
That Jimmy is a bit deluded by saying it was all QPR in the first half etc...Christ what a fool.
I agree. I really think Hughton has a problem with getting the players to play through those final 10 minutes.Any game when you're up, home or away, with 10 minutes to go means the opposition is going to come at you all guns blazing, Brighton seem to crumble at that point so often.
In my humble opinion CH brings this upon himself to a certain extent, by replacing front runners with defenders. We are not only then left toothless and at our opponents mercy. But it also unbalances our up to then successful planning and tactics. Other defenders then find themselves playing a different role from the previous 70 mins by virtue of defensive overcrowding. Well that's how I see it.
ps....Dunk was so unprofessional it beggars belief, very disappointing.
Our goals both had an element of fortune about them.
You do not have to torture yourselves about us chucking away nailed on points - they never were. On the balance of play we deserved a point tonight and nearly lost.
I thought they were well on top in the first half.