Pulls MUST pay Palace £3.5million

[Swillis]

Don't judge us by your own standards. We also know what it's like to have shyster owners, but didn't jump from the frying pan into the fire.

Your lot has been in administration twice.

Sorry, if you believe it was voluntary and the companies involved were perfectly happy to accept less money then I will leave you to your happy thoughts.

 

[Swillis]

It's the same little band of Palace trolls on here so don't presume they're all like that. I'd like to give special praise to Swillis though. You're my number one today. After telling me to calm down, he's crumbled and had to go off for a morning sleep.

Yes, having to sleep. Very weird that.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Sorry, if you believe it was voluntary and the companies involved were perfectly happy to accept less money then I will leave you to your happy thoughts.

Do you understand what voluntary means?

 

[papajaff]

Yes, having to sleep. Very weird that.

We've moved on, we're all grown up now. Join us.

 

[sparkie]

There does not have to be a legal dispute. Do you not know how these things work, its always a take what we offer or maybe spend up with nothing. Now I'm not saying Brighton were wrong to do this, its just things that happen. That the likes of you and me have no control over, so to use it as a stick to beat the opposing set of fans, is a bit tragic.

Well if there is no legal dispute then it cannot be equated to Palace's history of financial 'shenanigans' can it ?

And this is the only reason this supposed deal with an unspecified supplier is ever mentioned - as an attempt to claim that Palace's cheating a falsely high league position at the expense of their creditors is the same as what the albion did.

But there is no dispute. The deal was possibly done. No one felt aggrieved and had to go to court. No one had a financial settlement imposed on them.

 

[A League Apart]

Well if there is no legal dispute then it cannot be equated to Palace's history of financial 'shenanigans' can it ?

And this is the only reason this supposed deal with an unspecified supplier is ever mentioned - as an attempt to claim that Palace's cheating a falsely high league position at the expense of their creditors is the same as what the albion did.

But there is no dispute. The deal was possibly done. No one felt aggrieved and had to go to court. No one had a financial settlement imposed on them.

Once again, you're lumping together dealings of previous owners with the club as a whole.
Show me any proof of financial shennanigans involving Parish and co. because you're labelling them the same.
We've all had owners we'd rather never been born, don't you think?

 

[sparkie]

Once again, you're lumping together dealings of previous owners with the club as a whole.
Show me any proof of financial shennanigans involving Parish and co. because you're labelling them the same.
We've all had owners we'd rather never been born, don't you think?

Sorry, I do forget you are now CPFC2010, and 6 years old.

The previous Palace has long since expired.

 

[Bold Seagull]

Glass houses. Football fans love to chuck stones from their glass houses.

 

[A League Apart]

Sorry, I do forget you are now CPFC2010, and 6 years old.

The previous Palace has long since expired.

No. The previous owners are now extinct.
Take a look at our club honours. It doesn't just say Play Off winners 2013. It also contains the words 1979 Division Two Champions.
Remember that one?

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

Since when has the PL had the power to force an ex-employee to repay money to a previous employer ? Off to court they go .....

It's not the PL though

"Palace took the case to an independent mediation tribunal set up under FA rules to avoid football disputes going to court"

I presume this is legal binding as sports arbitration has proved to be so in the past.

 

[sparkie]

No. The previous owners are now extinct.
Take a look at our club honours. It doesn't just say Play Off winners 2013. It also contains the words 1979 Division Two Champions.
Remember that one?

I thought CPFC2010 is a new club, a fresh start, and a clean break from the historic past of financial mismanagement ?

 

[A League Apart]

I thought CPFC2010 is a new club, a fresh start, and a clean break from the historic past of financial mismanagement ?

Well you thought wrong. Again.
CPFC2010 are the present owners. We're still the same Crystal Palace formed in 1905.

 

[sparkie]

Well you thought wrong. Again.
CPFC2010 are the present owners. We're still the same Crystal Palace formed in 1905.

OK, I'll remember that if some palace troll ever claims that palace's financial gamesmanship before 2010 has no longer any relevance.

 

[Swillis]

Do you understand what voluntary means?

Let's not pretend I'm the stupid one here. Either you don't want to know what I'm on about, you do know but are trying to deny it or you are just very, very stupid.

 

[Sweeney Todd]

Well you thought wrong. Again.
CPFC2010 are the present owners. We're still the same Crystal Palace formed in 1905.

Your username might soon be obsolete...unless, of course, the unthinkable happens...

 

[Trelford Mills Guide Dog]

It's International Victory Over Palace Day.

Mine's a Guiness

This still makes me chuckle ... even though he [and spanish Dave] have departed.

http://youtu.be/Hi3i8T4U364

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Let's not pretend I'm the stupid one here.

I don't have to pretend.

 

[A League Apart]

OK, I'll remember that if some palace troll ever claims that palace's financial gamesmanship before 2010 has no longer any relevance.

Ta.

 

[Swillis]

I don't have to pretend.

No you are of course right. Companies who were expecting to be paid a certain amount of money, were delighted to have to accept less on the proviso the alternative may be getting nothing.
Some Brighton fans, deluded? No, of course not.

 

[A League Apart]

This still makes me chuckle ... even though he [and spanish Dave] have departed.

http://youtu.be/Hi3i8T4U364

This one's even more chucklesome....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYbkybiC8d0