The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,399
Vandalism is vandalism, it’s like the blocking roads etc is all for a ‘good cause’ until someone in your family misses out on critical medical treatment because of the ‘peaceful’ protestI'm a little disappointed this morning. In a couple of hours last night it had escalated from putting some paint on a snooker table to stabbing tennis players, violence and revolution. I expected absolute ARMAGEDDON this morning when I got up, only to find it was still a bit of paint on a snooker table which got resolved with a Hoover
I asked the supporters of these kinds of acts in one of my earlier posts, where is the line drawn?
For example one of these JSO protestors/vigilantes tomorrow goes to a local graveyard and smashes up the lot, paints just stop oil on the church etc is that too far? Or is it just acceptable that because you perceive the cause to be a good one, that any action is for the greater good?
This is what I can’t get my head around, somewhere a line needs to be drawn on what is acceptable, you may laugh but I wonder how many people at the snooker yesterday will have some kind of PTSD from what they saw, for a split second I bet they thought the guy was about to blow himself up or something… I was watching it live and I thought it so I dread to think if I was there.