I would not join the 600 in the privy either , just rubbersctmping meaningless proclamations. It is something to be consingned to history when they used to have to advise the King.
Neither would I kneel & kiss Her Majesty's hand or swear to be a loyal defender of monarchy.....
But that's why I would never run for public office...,
Fine, but then let Corbyn say it, which he hasnt.
Stop interpreting his non conformity as something special, he hasnt said a word in opposition to any of these things, he just makes lame excuses and then says he respects those very things you then feel he has somehow casually dismissed.
According to this list, eight of the current batch of ministers "snubbed" their first Privy Council meeting - and that doesn't include CMD, who did have an excuse.
I agree with MoH, they must be really terrified of him to come up with this rubbish
So what was Camerons excuse for not attending for 3 months? I don't remember it ever being mentioned before?
Fine, but then let Corbyn say it, which he hasnt.
Stop interpreting his non conformity as something special, he hasnt said a word in opposition to any of these things, he just makes lame excuses and then says he respects those very things you then feel he has somehow casually dismissed.
Exactly, but no one has reason to believe that Cameron did it out of disrespect for HM, but some Corbyn supporters seem to be self congratulating themselves on their leaders set of anti establishment principles, but he hasnt backed up his actions with any specific confirmation denouncing of it.
I've not heard any 'self congratulating'. Again , why did Cameron take 3 months? Blimey are you sure your not a Tory MP?
If you look at previous posts you will see some sort of interpretation that this, firstly was a snub and a jolly good and worthy snub just as his non singing was.
My point is that firstly I am not sure this non show has any relevance to his political position or view on the privvy council and that his previous non singing of the national anthem was quickly reversed into he will sing in future, whatever way you look at it, you may dismiss the relevance but you cannot file it away under 'principles' either.
I've not heard any 'self congratulating'. Again , why did Cameron take 3 months?...?
If you look at previous posts you will see some sort of interpretation that this, firstly was a snub and a jolly good and worthy snub just as his non singing was.
My point is that firstly I am not sure this non show has any relevance to his political position or view on the privvy council and that his previous non singing of the national anthem was quickly reversed into he will sing in future, whatever way you look at it, you may dismiss the relevance but you cannot file it away under 'principles' either.
have not seen anywhere that he will sing it in the future, unless he somehow changes the words to the red flag otherwise like me he will stand silent.
they are no better than you or I, and are human as the trauma's in their family show, they just happen to be born into that family.
Swedish royals have it right they bike around their capital
I am sure JC has principles one being listening and respecting others views, something I am sure he would want others to do to him
I think you might find that the same is true for Labour supporters who talk far more about DC and the Tories than they do about their own party . Look back and you will see - a few on this page - so would it be fair to say that you are terrified of the Tories, by your logic?
Respect his right to have a view, even if it it is utter claptrap, fair point?