https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/n...abuse-damages-could-come-from-taxpayer-285819
Gob well and truly smacked.
Gob well and truly smacked.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/n...abuse-damages-could-come-from-taxpayer-285819
Gob well and truly smacked.
Fiddler on the roof.
Does anyone honestly think justice will prevail here? The Family will help him wriggle out of it. They swerve most of their more unappetising obligations by citing Queen’s Consent anyway. This will be no different.
Useless leaches, each and every one of ‘em.
This case can be considered a test as to whether or not having a royal family really is in the public interest. I am vehemently anti-royal and I make no apology for that, and one of my arguments is that the entire family is simply above the law (in fact, they are often protected in statute).
Surely Prince Andrew has to face up to these allegations? If not, it pretty much proves my point that even a relatively minor royal (with huge delusions of importance) can rape who he likes. (I'm not saying he's guilty, but if there is a case then it needs to be heard).
Well well well, I guess you wouldnt be that surprised............!!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-andrew-epstein-diplomatic-immunity-b1903413.html
I can see what you're saying, but that article is a lawyer for the victims saying what he thinks might happen.
Spencer Kuvin, who represents several of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, told The Mirror that the prince’s legal team are “sure” to consider the move, adding that they would have a “strong case”.
Excuse me? "Sure" to consider the move? Why the hell should he be in a position to do that? He wasn't acting on behalf of the state.
Spencer Kuvin, who represents several of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, told The Mirror that the prince’s legal team are “sure” to consider the move, adding that they would have a “strong case”.
Excuse me? "Sure" to consider the move? Why the hell should he be in a position to do that? He wasn't acting on behalf of the state.
The article explains he was with a trade mission when the offence was alleged to happen.
I don't know if that's true or not, but just quoting what it says.
sounds like a lawyer expressing what they'd do on that side of the case, suggesting it is a viable defense in their view.
Am I the only one who feels that Prince Andrew does nothing to dispel suspicions of guilt, when he and his legal team are openly hiding from those attempting to serve legal papers on him?
Is this what our ‘nobility’ has come to? Behaving like somebody hiding behind the sofa when the TV Licensing people call?
Prince Andrew's team dispute claims accuser served legal papers https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58527909
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can we do a swap with Anne Sacoolas so they both can face justice.
Am I the only one who feels that Prince Andrew does nothing to dispel suspicions of guilt, when he and his legal team are openly hiding from those attempting to serve legal papers on him?
Is this what our ‘nobility’ has come to? Behaving like somebody hiding behind the sofa when the TV Licensing people call?
Prince Andrew's team dispute claims accuser served legal papers https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58527909
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk