[Football] Premier League to set out protocol forcing ‘bad’ owners to sell

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



chip

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,323
Glorious Goodwood
Saw this in FT, will it do anything? Sorry, behind paywall so only opening paragraphs:


Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/64389b93-0ecf-43bc-9f07-0452b1d11df0

The Premier League is drawing up a formal process to force “bad” football club owners to sell their shares, following Roman Abramovich’s chaotic exit from Chelsea last year. The English top flight is in talks with its members about introducing a so-called divestment protocol, according to four people with knowledge of the matter. This would set out a process for club owners to exit in cases when the league bars them from serving as directors owing to “disqualifying events”. The discussion follows moves by the Premier League to toughen up its so-called owners’ and directors’ test, which assesses whether someone is fit to buy into a club. Disqualifying events, which can be appealed, now include human rights abuses and an extended list of criminal offences such as violence, corruption, fraud and tax evasion.
 








beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,023
expect it to come to nothing as there isn't legal backing, a forced sale would be challenged through courts even if they've agreed T&Cs of the Premier League memebership.
 


drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
23,629
Burgess Hill
'This would set out a process for club owners to exit in cases when the league bars them from serving as directors owing to “disqualifying events'

So, what is considered 'disqualifying events'?

1. Murdering journalists (Newcastle)
2. Being owned by a nation (Man City and Newcastle)
3. Being American (Liverpool, Chelsea, Bournemouth, Arsenal, Aston Villa, Burnley, Man Utd, Crystal Palace, Fulham)

Or am I being harsh?
 






A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,558
Deepest, darkest Sussex
No way the PL will force the owners of Newcastle or City out, so utterly meaningless
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,023
'This would set out a process for club owners to exit in cases when the league bars them from serving as directors owing to “disqualifying events'

So, what is considered 'disqualifying events'?

1. Murdering journalists (Newcastle)
2. Being owned by a nation (Man City and Newcastle)
3. Being American (Liverpool, Chelsea, Bournemouth, Arsenal, Aston Villa, Burnley, Man Utd, Crystal Palace, Fulham)

Or am I being harsh?
yes, being a nation or foreigner are not disqualifying events.
 






Leekbrookgull

Well-known member
Jul 14, 2005
16,386
Leek
Couldn't sort out Bury, Macclesfield FC let alone the Southend United situation and please just remember that it's The Sky Sports Premier League they call the tune here. As for sports washing we have known for years that The EPL is best washing machine in the world.
 






St Leonards Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 10, 2012
554
No way the PL will force the owners of Newcastle or City out, so utterly meaningless
You would imagine Newcastle’s owners lawyers would run rings around anything the PL could afford.

The minute they passed the “fit and proper” test it was all over.
 


fly high

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
1,737
in a house
What a load of bollocks, will be as effective as FFP.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top