Weststander
Well-known member
What if though, halfway through next season you are then seeing progress against covid-19 and the government relaxes rules to allow spectators? Are you then going to continue that season behind closed doors to protect the integrity or allow spectators because that's the football we know and love and will also help financially boost clubs? Also what if then lockdowns are more localized, some clubs lose their home advantage or have to play at neutral stadia? I take the point about losing home advantage but then when you play the remaining 'away' games the home team will equally lose their advantage, there is no perfect solution but having played three quarters of this season I think when is practically possible we should pick this season up again.
Null and voiding this season may clear up this season but only leads to the same issues for next season, a full season that we do not know if or when it can be started and even then if there are 2nd or 3rd waves of infections potentially you have to suspend that season. I'd much rather we finish off this season as and when we practically can which looks increasingly likely to be over the summer behind closed doors and then we have a complete season and we can look at how to practically stage the 20/21 season.
Excellent post, again.
Every epidemiologist and virologist is advising that covid-19 will haunt the UK in 4 to 8 waves over a very long period. What happens if season 2020/21 or 2021/22 is under way, then halted, with resumed matches held behind closed doors? Complainants will mention, again, the unfairness that their table rivals difficult away games to come will be behind closed doors, that more of our home games came in the empty stadia period, and a long list of other injustices.
It’s a very imperfect sporting situation for many months and possibly a couple of years to come, we’ll all have to learn to accept this, as football flips back and forth from different crowd scenarios, on instruction from the government.