Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Really need The Blades to hit the ground running.
Now apply that same logic and numbers to the UK population. That would equate to 198,000 new cases. Still think it's safe?
Edited to add: I've seen the same logic said about the Premier League testing. Saying that only 0.43% of test have come back positive since they started. In the same week, that would equate to 283,800 people testing positive nationally.
....and kill a vulnerable relative of any of them.
A footballer living with a vulnerable relative will either go and live somewhere else or he won't play. That's the way all of us who live with vulnerable relatives do it - work from home (obviously not an option for a footballer), furlough, or live away from home.
A footballer who doesn't live with a vulnerable relative will carry on not visiting as he has done all along. Either way, there is no risk to the vulnerable relative.
Where there might be a risk is where an apparently non-vulnerable relative gets the virus. For that, it's the same risk as all working people have. And again, if the footballer considers that too much of a risk, he can go on furlough. (He could probably sit at home and still demand full pay under a footballer's contract, actually. But there would be a moral issue with that one, I would think.)
Play those 2 games, hope for a Man City defeat.
Play the first Liverpool game so they can win the title.
And then call it all off, job done.
Yes, all that is STBO.........but apart from healthcare professionals, I'm not aware of any other group of employed people that are yet knowingly not social distancing though. Footballers are taking more risk than most other people that have gone back to work - admittedly mitigated in part by regular testing (accepting the known limitations of testing)
Your last sentance really should put an end to all this.
Bring it on. Correct decision with safety at the forefront
Interesting they've put the outstanding games in hand first - maybe over-analysing, but by getting all teams on the same number of games means it would be a slightly easier set of decisions to make re relegation etc if all teams have played the same number of games, so if they need to pull the plug sometime before the final end to the season they can...................
That really only becomes relavent if the season was curtailed after these next two games, otherwise there is always likely to be someone behind step, unless each round of games is going to be played on the same day until the season is finished...
Depending on how they schedule the fixtures for the first weekend, remembering Liverpool need 6 points, the could win the league at Everton. This is their first game but Man City could have played twice by Sunday 4 pm.
FA Cup games being rescheduled today. Champs League will be a mini tourney in August.
Basically, with Euro 2020 next summer, it's going to be nonstop footy for a long, long time. Wonder how they will schedule some breaks.
It looked like they were going to ditch the neutral grounds idea? I guess that will be announced along with the fixtures / TV allocations imminently... #BACKSTRONGER
Doesn't sound possible for Liverpool to win the league at Goodison even if results favour them. On Fivel Live this morning it was stated, just before an interview with Murray, that games would be played at the original venue except for a few select matches on the advice of Police. No way will Liverpool be anywhere near home when they win it imo.
I find this quite sad. I am no Liverpool fan by any means but if it pans out they get to win it at home they should have the opportunity to do so, even behind closed doors. Football fans being treated as 2nd class citizens who can't be trusted as usual.