maltaseagull
Well-known member
According to this article, we don't!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49288182
Very disappointed if this is true.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49288182
Very disappointed if this is true.
I suspect the response from the club will be something along the lines of:
" we outsource a number of our matchday roles such as security, catering and cleaning staff, and therefore have no control over the hourly rates being paid to those staff members. We are one of the few clubs who pays its staff over and above the national living wage."
Or something like that.
That is a rubbish excuse. Brewdog for example only use contractors that pay the living wage - i.e security, cleaning etc....
According to this article, we don't!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49288182
Very disappointed if this is true.
most the roles, certainly on match day, are part time. how can they make a living from such work to be paid "living wage"?
the amounts on transfer fees shouldnt really matter, thats the market cost for doing that business. so why not expect to pay market rate for jobs?
Read [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION]'s post on the link posted by [MENTION=4573]Green Cross Code Man[/MENTION] before laying into the club FFS:
Extract:
On the first day of what is set to be the most lucrative ever season for the world’s richest league, The Daily Telegraph can reveal that workers at Premier League football matches and the country’s other most money-spinning sporting events are regularly being paid less than the “real” cost of living.
An investigation by The Telegraph discovered that the teams’ commitment two years ago to paying an independently calculated living wage to all permanent staff is being undermined by their ongoing use of cheaper casual labour.
Manchester United, Southampton, Stoke City, Crystal Palace, Bournemouth, Watford and newly promoted Huddersfield Town all admitted to [directly employing casual staff on contracts which pay below the independently-calculated living wage] when approached.
Beyond Chelsea and Everton [who are the only two top-flight sides accredited as doing so by the Living Wage Foundation], the only Premier League clubs to explicitly deny directly employing casual staff on less than the independently-calculated living wage were Arsenal, Manchester City, Leicester City, Swansea City, Brighton and Hove Albion and West Ham United.
Why put the emphasis on football clubs ? The Living Wage should be the baseline for everyone in the 5th Biggest Economy in the World surely ?
The national LIVING wage is legally payable to employees over the age of 24. Forcing a football club to pay all staff that amount, when 75% of match day staff are probably under that age, will result in one thing, less match day staff.
That is a rubbish excuse. Brewdog for example only use contractors that pay the living wage - i.e security, cleaning etc....