Amazing that that foul was deemed in the same phase of play but the foul on March up there was deemed a different one even though it directly led to a goal.
I don't think the March one was to do with the phase of play, more that when the ref went to the screen he didn't see enough evidence of a foul by March so stuck with his original decision?
Think these may have been different events - or even a conflation of events?I'm fairly sure the VAR concluded it was a foul but it was a different phase of play and the ref wasn't asked to look at the monitor. In any case it was the clearest foul anyone could ever see.
The 'foul' BY March led to Mitoma scoring. The ref did go to the monitor - and stuck with his decision (this was against Spurs - not Villa)
There was a foul ON March v Villa that wasn't given as a penalty.
There was also a penalty awarded against March v Villa that was then overturned after ref went to the monitor - but I think that was a different game?