[NSC] Premier League 12-15/1/23

[Kinky Gerbil]

City are a worse side with Haaland.

They would have been better spending the money on a defender

 

[Brok]

Lot of Man U fans in 1901 East seemingly

Maybe Brighton fans like seeing Man City lose?

 

[pb21]

Not how I saw it. He left it for Fernandez and the City defenders didn’t challenge.

He very clearly, IMO, affects the players movement and thinking.

I'll be right pissed off if Liverpool score a similar goal today.

 

[RM-Taylor]

Not how I saw it. He left it for Fernandez and the City defenders didn’t challenge.

Totally absurd decision to allow that goal. Rashford is clearly playing the ball, and interfering with play.

If that goal was against us then there would be complete and utter outroar on here.

 

[Coldeanseagull]

Everyone seems to beat city nowadays...our U21's are 1 up!

 

[Weststander]

Hope you chucked a cheeky fiver on that.

Sadly not.

Couldn’t believe those odds - Manure home advantage, an erratic City this season, Manure have chucked even more £ on players and 30 minutes to go.

 

[birthofanorange]

Sadly not.

Couldn’t believe those odds - Manure home advantage, an erratic City this season, Manure have chucked even more £ on players and 30 minutes to go.

Yes, surprisingly generous from the bookies - wish I'd taken advantage of that, too, especially as they're the form team.

 

[Weststander]

Lot of Man U fans in 1901 East seemingly

All the secret Arsenal fans.

 

[Weststander]

Yes, surprisingly generous from the bookies - wish I'd taken advantage of that, too, especially as they're the form team.

Dreaming now of £30 @ 30/1

 

[Stato]

If a player can be interfering with play by standing in the goalkeeper's eyeline, how can he not be interfering with play running alongside a loose ball giving the defender a decision to make about whether to cover or attack the ball? Utterly ludicrous decision.

 

[Jimmy Grimble]

That was a blatant offside. You can tell Howard Webb is back involved.

 

[Bodian]

On this interpretation of the rule - shouldn't Mac Allister's cracker have stood against Leicester?

 

[Thunder Bolt]

I said the two cup wins would encourage Southampton. Pleased for Jonah.

 

[Acker79]

Everton 1-2 Southampton
Nottingham Forest 2-0 Leicester City
Wolverhampton Wanderers 1-0 West Ham United

Bottom three all on 15 points now.

 

[Bodian]

Everton 1-2 Southampton
Nottingham Forest 2-0 Leicester City
Wolverhampton Wanderers 1-0 West Ham United

Bottom three all on 15 points now.

Even if we didn't win another game all season, we might actually be safe right now!!

 

[smillie's garden]

Most I've ever wanted Plucky Muff to get a result

 

[Robdinho]

On this interpretation of the rule - shouldn't Mac Allister's cracker have stood against Leicester?

Exactly this - have they changed the rule? I'm sure it used to state that the act of merely moving toward the ball was enough to become "active", but that wording no longer seems to be in the rulebook

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

2 point between 14th and 20th, spicy.

 

[Acker79]

Toney traps the defender's arm and pulls the defender into him, falling over and gets awarded a penalty. 1-0 Brentford.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Not how I saw it. He left it for Fernandez and the City defenders didn’t challenge.

Apparently this isn’t interfering.