Not sure if this has really sunk in yet, but football success is not based on crowds.
that is just utter bolloks
Not sure if this has really sunk in yet, but football success is not based on crowds.
And Crystal Palace's.Not at all, sir. Just pointing out that whilst I've no doubt that Brighton's crowds will eclipse Wigan's next season, I see no reason for them to be sniffed at and considered such a lesser managerial opportunity than your club in terms of squad, budget, and promotion prospects.
that is just utter bolloks
Not at all, sir. Just pointing out that whilst I've no doubt that Brighton's crowds will eclipse Wigan's next season, I see no reason for them to be sniffed at and considered such a lesser managerial opportunity than your club in terms of squad, budget, and promotion prospects.
How so?
I don't recall saying any of those things. Why should such an irrelevant and baseless attack come forth rather than a simple discussion of the reasonable point I made on this thread?Why are you still here?
Shouldn't you be on the Man City board telling them that Jedinak is better than Yaya Toure, Speroni is the best keeper in the Premier League and that your fans (although not often in attendance) are the best in the country etc, etc, etc.
This was supposed be one of the upsides of you going up!!
Wooosh
I don't recall saying any of those things. Why should such an irrelevant and baseless attack come forth rather than a simple discussion of the reasonable point I made on this thread?
...because your anti Albion stuff on the BBS is pretty forthright. Now you are on here being nice and it rankles a bit! I can only imagine how INCREDIBLY smug you feel when posting on here and frankly I am a little jealous!
Anyway carry on. No derailment intended.
How so?
Rumours that The Wally with The Brolly is very much in the frame for Wigan.
Which will mean we've successfully swerved him
We're getting a Chinese manager?
Not at all, sir. Just pointing out that whilst I've no doubt that Brighton's crowds will eclipse Wigan's next season, I see no reason for them to be sniffed at and considered such a lesser managerial opportunity than your club in terms of squad, budget, and promotion prospects.
I think Wigan may be genuine promotion prospects, however that will be dependent on them retaining their premiership players, getting a decent coach in who is able to continue some of Martinez's work. Also, in terms of budget I would imagine that a lot of their players are on fairly good salaries, so the parachute payments are likely to be eaten up.
The crowd size will be relevant in terms of income and inevitably they will be left with their hard core fans.
Despite the lure of European football, it will be difficult to attract the 'right type' of player in the Championship to a unattractive northern outpost.
Fair comment. I would put Brighton and Wigan on a reasonably even footing at the moment. Wigan I would group as one of those clubs who have to go back up within their parachute money years or forget it. Brighton are boosted by their fan base, but saddled by their debts (I know it s supposedly to Tony Bloom etc. but I think it's clear he doesn't want the club to be a money pit). I feel a lot rides on how long your new support is willing to fund promotion campaigns by watching Championship football.
Saddled with debt is perhaps too strong a phrase, but we're not talking just about TB's historical debt, we're talking about two years of reasonably substantial losses, despite unprecedented income. And it is this disparity between seeming income and seeming expenditure potential that appears to have driven such a wedge between the leading figures (ex figures?) at your club.I don't agree that we're saddled by debts, though that's the way a lot of Palace fans tend to see it.
Tony Bloom clearly would like some kind of return on his investment in due course, which is most likely to happen if we reach the Premier League. But he's not like a normal investor. I suspect he knows he may never see his money again, at least in full, but he's come into the role knowing that's probably the case and can afford to lose the money he's gambled. He's a poker player after all.
Saddled with debt is perhaps too strong a phrase, but we're not talking just about TB's historical debt, we're talking about two years of reasonably substantial losses, despite unprecedented income. And it is this disparity between seeming income and seeming expenditure potential that appears to have driven such a wedge between the leading figures (ex figures?) at your club.
I should think Tony Bloom had anticipated the losses of the first two years - or at least had some inclination that they were inevitable. They came as a surprise to us as fans, because we don't see the spreadsheets. But he must have known what was likely. We didn't have any exceptional or unexpected costs, or income, that I can see.
Either way, I think it's fair to say it seems to be hampering your club's spending power. (Not knocking that btw - I admire Bloom's sensible approach - it just seems at odds with fans who think your 30,000 fans at home games should = Champions League success, and your manager/ex manager who thinks his club's massive income streams should = one of, if not the, division's biggest spenders.
Either way, I think it's fair to say it seems to be hampering your club's spending power. (Not knocking that btw - I admire Bloom's sensible approach - it just seems at odds with fans who think your 30,000 fans at home games should = Champions League success, and your manager/ex manager who thinks his club's massive income streams should = one of, if not the, division's biggest spenders.