B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
perhaps we have?
I do hope so... we really do need to move onto the next target pretty soon if KLL is not coming...
perhaps we have?
It is fiction. The fee was agreed, the contract was agreed, everyone seemed to have heard he was signing about 2 wks ago... and then he passed the medical. We then decided to go back for a better deal or a loan to buy as it all seemed too good to be true...
I believe a loan player's parent club continues to pay his insurance costs whilst he is with his loan club. I may be wrong, but as I understand it a player can still sign having failed a medical, but the higher the transfer fee, the more exponentially the insurance goes up. Proportionately, Chelsea/Man City would not buy a 30m player if he failed a medical as the insurance would be scandalous. The query is not whether he is fit to play - but whether we should pay a record fee for a player that a medical assessment says is vulnerable to further serious injury. It's a risk we take on ourselves, which is true of every player for every club in the land, who is only one late tackle away from a career-ending injury. The question is whether the risk is worth it for the fee.
Serious question: how do you know this?It is fiction. The fee was agreed, the contract was agreed, everyone seemed to have heard he was signing about 2 wks ago... and then he passed the medical. We then decided to go back for a better deal or a loan to buy as it all seemed too good to be true...
Is that so?
Serious question: how do you know this?
wheres the other KKL thread gone, i miss that one