Bevendean Hillbilly
New member
Should have been on the phone yesterday, instead on on TV prattling on about his beloved Chelsea.
Yes because he doesn't have a mobile or any assistants.
Should have been on the phone yesterday, instead on on TV prattling on about his beloved Chelsea.
What's a 'serial licker'?
The guy is a serial licker. Never has an objective view of anyone connected with the Club.
You are always the same.
Adams gets a slagging, you are right there defending him. People could see he was destroying the Club, but not you.
You never have a bad word to say about anyone connected with the Club, and just hang on in there with your little clique. Not an original thought between you.
On the right player.
Please don't tell me you're going down the road of "... let's take a gamble, spend the money and see if it gets us to the Premiership..."
I'm not saying you said that directly, but it's the prevalent attitude among many. Gus is given a budget - a certain amount to spend. If he can't afford a player, he doesn't get him - it's that simple.
As for the comment about being on the phone - do you really feel Gus the only person sorting this of thing out? He does have a team of people working on this.
I haven't mentioned anything about anyone being on the phone or not.
My view is simply this and nothing more : that unless we get an experienced loan signing in, or get very lucky with Ashley Barnes not having his ban extended further, then the season is over and we'll sink to mid table.
I suppose I'll get another condescending facepalm for that.
But you are writing this in a manner which assumes Ulloa won't be playing all the time. We are looking for BACKUP, not a #1 striker.
I think the facepalm was from the, frankly ridiculous statement of, "we've given up on the playoffs" or words to that effect. Yeah, let's give up. 1 point is just TOO MUCH to make up.
Cancel Sunday.
What a real w@nker you are!
I haven't mentioned anything about anyone being on the phone or not.
My view is simply this and nothing more : that unless we get an experienced loan signing in, or get very lucky with Ashley Barnes not having his ban extended further, then the season is over and we'll sink to mid table.
I suppose I'll get another condescending facepalm for that.
Quite right. Sorry about that.
You don't know that we'll 'sink to mid-table'. You're offering opinion as fact - I'd say that's pretty condescending.
We have players from every position capable of scoring. Not getting this striker in doesn't mean we can't or won't score, it means our back-up is limited - a bit like having a sub's bench without a goalkeeper.
You can write the season off if you wish - I still see plenty of quality out there.
Quite right. Sorry about that.
You don't know that we'll 'sink to mid-table'. You're offering opinion as fact - I'd say that's pretty condescending.
We have players from every position capable of scoring. Not getting this striker in doesn't mean we can't or won't score, it means our back-up is limited - a bit like having a sub's bench without a goalkeeper.
You can write the season off if you wish - I still see plenty of quality out there.
Am I the only one that would actually rather Barker (or even Toby) come on for the last 20 minutes, rather than some loanee that doesn't know the club, and our style of play? Reports of Barkers short run out in the week where along the lines of "lots of energy", "looked hungry", and had a decent effort. I imagine he'd be PUMPED to come on against Palace. Sure he's not a World beater, but then neither would a loanee, otherwise they'd be playing for their own club.
Am I the only one that would actually rather Barker (or even Toby) come on for the last 20 minutes, rather than some loanee that doesn't know the club, and our style of play? Reports of Barkers short run out in the week where along the lines of "lots of energy", "looked hungry", and had a decent effort. I imagine he'd be PUMPED to come on against Palace. Sure he's not a World beater, but then neither would a loanee, otherwise they'd be playing for their own club.
why wont Gus take a gamble with someone
Of course what I write is an opinion. At no stage did I say it was fact I cannot see the future.
Actually you've used this opinion as fact thing a lot when putting other posters down in the past.
For future reference : EVERYTHING I SAY IS AN OPINION
Clear?
But he's entitled to his view isent he
Will Buckley going up front as a 'last resort' wouldn't exactly upset me.