Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,275
Next 2 on-paper-winnable games v Fulham and Palace will decide the fate of the beardy fraud and his ever-expanding band of hangers-on
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Potter [NOT] at Chelsea
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
So Chelsea lose to Fulham and we have a new dilemma. Do we want Palace to lose, or spank Chelsea and see the once great Graham struggling for survivalNext 2 on-paper-winnable games v Fulham and Palace will decide the fate of the beardy fraud and his ever-expanding band of hangers-on
!!!Oh happy days..
BrightonCottager
Well-known member
Hopefully we'll (Fulham) prolong his misery tomorrow night.
JamesAndTheGiantHead
Well-known member
A 0 - 0 bore draw with 4 red cards apiece would be just the ticket.So Chelsea lose to Fulham and we have a new dilemma. Do we want Palace to lose, or spank Chelsea and see the once great Graham struggling for survival
Oh happy days..
willalbion
Well-known member
That’s a bit of a mixed message. You’re safe but… not really
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
If Chelsea draw with Fulham, then regardless of the Palace v Chelsea result, we would move into 6th if we beat Liverpool.So Chelsea lose to Fulham and we have a new dilemma. Do we want Palace to lose, or spank Chelsea and see the once great Graham struggling for survival
Oh happy days..
- Jul 6, 2011
- 2,408
A Fulham draw suits us better and still comes with a side order of schadenfreude. A palarse win is technically the best result except who could in their heart of hearts really be happy with that?
Two draws please GP.
Miss you x
Two draws please GP.
Miss you x
Coldeanseagull
Opinionated
Or lynched
Wrong-Direction
Well-known member
- Mar 10, 2013
- 13,618
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,182
So your quotes are not actually quotes?
There is a certain amount of your own interpretation involved. I think we are seeing the problem here. You have created a straw man arguments from your interpretation of what someone has said and applied that to all of us.
No wonder your arguments are so confused.
Swinging like a windcock in a gale
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
If Chelsea lose tomorrow just remember - I survived the Turin world cup semi final in Italia '90, Warwickshire beating Sussex in the dark at Lord's in 1993 and Frank Bruno losing before he'd entered the ring in Vegas 96 against Tyson - best wishes and stay strong.
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Wouldn’t it just be pointing in the direction of the wind?
Nope. That's a weird intepretation of what I've said.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,182
I don't think there is anything but a weird interpretation of what you have said. Because what you have said is weird.
I'm sorry but it comes across as one of two things. Either you are arguing with the mythical quote makers that didn't actually make the quotes because you did. Or you are passionately defending Potter against anyone that suggests he is anything less than a genius and can only be compared favourably to our new manager who we have no business liking or getting behind.
Feel free to make your point more succinctly if you like.
- Thread starter
- #498
If you approach the article from google, you tend to get a free pass around the paywall.
Should be the top item here:
chelsea save our season
We’re still struggling to get rid of Caicedo then according to that article. How did we end up with such a millstone?!
oldboyroy
Well-known member
It was easy managing Chelsea or picking the team 2 months ago with the abundance of talent to choose from. Now it feels like the toughest job in the world! What changed?