Their goals were preventable, the Trossard decision was unfortunate, but we could then also analyse their miss in the last min, Zeqiri miss and so on...Do you think any of Wolves’ goals were equally as fortunate or the decision against Trossard?
Still in.
Needs backing in the window. Keeper, left back and striker. The positions we desperately and obviously needed in the summer as stated on most threads on here and we didn’t sign any so I think he deserves some leeway because of that at least.
Still in.
Needs backing in the window. Keeper, left back and striker. The positions we desperately and obviously needed in the summer as stated on most threads on here and we didn’t sign any so I think he deserves some leeway because of that at least.
I’m neither in or out but that’s tosh.
WA just said “sack him or back him”, he called for the latter.
The Potter Outers "Yeah, it was a decent performance. Yeah, it was a spirited comeback in the 2nd half. Yeah the players showed character, and fight, something I've previously accused Potter of not getting out of them. Yeah we scored 3 goals, including from set pieces.... BUt HE PicKeD DNA BUrN. Potter OUT"
Trouble with March is he lets every attacking player get the ball onto his strongest foot to get the cross in did the same today.I don’t think we need a left back / LWB I thought March played well again and his delivery has much improved, dangerous even
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In some ways, yes they do have better players. Leeds have several players who can reliably strike a ball. Villa have Grealish.
But it's not that simple anyway. We are absolutely revolutionising the way we play... for the better. Too many of the players are just not good enough to play the way we aspire to play.
Those players will go. Just like others have. We are unlikely to be convincing this season, although we will stay up. Best things will come to those who wait, as dead wood goes and the Potter revolution enters its next chapter.
50 CJTC’s so far (19:56)