deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,773
Jorginho is now at Arsenal.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Potter & £323 million of talent into a 33 man squad.
- Thread starter AmexRuislip
- Start date
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,253
Potter's great strength was using his Emotional Intelligence degree to improve the players at his disposal. Building relationships and team spirit. This is not what is required at Chelsea. These players are the finished article already, used to winning. Enzo Fernandez is a case in point - what can Potter say to the World Cup winner when he himself has just 4 months of big club experience? What is needed is a manager with an aura, a proven track record at Europe''s elite clubs who the 33 players can look at and say "Yes, this guy is a proven winner who knows what he's talking about."
Red Squirrel
Well-known member
oops!
um bongo molongo
Well-known member
They have too many players and should ask us nicely to take Colwill off their hands permanently to help.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,994
just the one? long series of draws might have been ok for us, not going to cut it there.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,253
You wonder how Colwill feels watching all these new players arrive at his parent club. You also wonder whether Potter might switch to 2 rather than 3 centre backs in order to accommodate one more of his new attacking superstars. If so, things will get even harder for Colwill to break into that team. And you wonder whether Colwill has indicated he would rather sign for us, and if that is a factor why we didn't sign Matvienko. He only has to look at Broja and Gallagher to see how things don't always work out how you hope returning to Chelsea from a loan spell.
nickbrighton
Well-known member
- Feb 19, 2016
- 2,124
AFAIK a club can only add 3 players to their Euro squads for the knockout stages, no way is Potter keeping the new guys happy when they wont be allowed to play European football this season (and how many are cup tied anyway?)
the influx of new players means anyone on the fringes before this transfer window must now be really wondering how on earth the break into the reckoning.
Potter has an enourmous task just keeping tabs on everybody, let alone finding ways to get them playing time.
Billy Gilmour for example must actually be thinking he got out at the right time, and maybe Colwill will be wondering how on earth he fits in to the dressing room next season
the influx of new players means anyone on the fringes before this transfer window must now be really wondering how on earth the break into the reckoning.
Potter has an enourmous task just keeping tabs on everybody, let alone finding ways to get them playing time.
Billy Gilmour for example must actually be thinking he got out at the right time, and maybe Colwill will be wondering how on earth he fits in to the dressing room next season
Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
No such thing as 'cup-tied' in European comps, but yes, can only add 3 new players to squad
willalbion
Well-known member
One would think they’ll be looking to sell academy graduates, as that enters the yearly balance sheet as pure profit and goes a long way to balancing the books for FFP. Seems the polar opposite to ‘the project’ Potter was sold.
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
How very GP, Sterling at RB? He’ll love that.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
I believe in Joe Hendry
- Oct 4, 2003
- 12,030
Most of the new players signed don't have to be named in the 25 man PL squad as they still qualify as U21s. The cut off date for this season was players born on or after Jan 1st 2001. I think it's only Mudryk and Felix that are old enough to be named.
The problem is the Champions League squad which has a lot more complicated rules and underage players can only be added to the "b list" or whatever it is called if they've spent a certain number of seasons at the club. Some of the new signings won't be able to play in that competition.
Of course none of that matters when Potter is going to have a real hard time keeping a squad that big happy as its going to be difficult to give them all game time.
The problem is the Champions League squad which has a lot more complicated rules and underage players can only be added to the "b list" or whatever it is called if they've spent a certain number of seasons at the club. Some of the new signings won't be able to play in that competition.
Of course none of that matters when Potter is going to have a real hard time keeping a squad that big happy as its going to be difficult to give them all game time.
Fascinating to see how this plays out….going to be several players with high expectations being benched or even outside the squad on a regular basis, integrating all of them into some kind of shape/system will be tricky and pressure on Potter for results after so much spending (from the fans and media, if not Boehly) himself will be huge.
Not all of these players are going to work out……the long FFP-circumventing contracts are going to seriously bite them on the arse at some point.
Not all of these players are going to work out……the long FFP-circumventing contracts are going to seriously bite them on the arse at some point.
Brian Fantana
Well-known member
It is a total mess really. Forgetting the somewhat suicidal financial aspects of some of the deals, the practicalities of keeping a squad of that size (and overall quality) happy is going to be an enormous task. Pep famously likes to work with a squad of only 19 for the very reason of not having to balance a huge number of egos who won't be involved in the matchday squad.
As great strengths go it's beginning to look as solid as my great strength to not dip into an open bag of licorice allsorts.
RandyWanger
Je suis rôti de boeuf
What could possibly go wrong 
Codner's Wallop
Well-known member
- Sep 11, 2013
- 1,431
The great irony is that every time Chelsea either target or buy another world superstar, Potter’s heart probably sinks a bit further….
There is going to be an attempt at an enormous clearout in the summer - it'll be interesting to see how that goes.
My prediction is that they won't be able to shift as many as they'd like and will have to accept lower fees than market value for the ones they do shift as buying clubs won't be able to afford to match the wages they are on. There's only a handful of clubs outside the premier league that can even think about paying Chelsea-level wages, so there's going to be a lot of heavy-lifting required by the likes of Everton, West Ham and Palace (seemingly Forest too if they are still in the PL)
- Aug 7, 2003
- 8,073
I think the main problem will be that all these egocentric primadonnas will want to be top of the pecking order;
Well, I cost more than you,
Yes, but I'm paid more than you
I have more Twitter followers than you
etc. etc.
Well, I cost more than you,
Yes, but I'm paid more than you
I have more Twitter followers than you
etc. etc.
marcos3263
Well-known member
They will lobby the F.A. to amend the substitutes bench to 25 and allow 20 subs each half.
Also 11 is an odd number - why 11? Shirley it would be neater to have 2 keepers, and 6 each of defenders, midfield and attackers= 20
Plus they could adopt the American football idea of an offence and defensive team with ad breaks in between change overs to keep the sponsors happy.
The game may suffer at first until we get used to it but think of the bigger picture
Also 11 is an odd number - why 11? Shirley it would be neater to have 2 keepers, and 6 each of defenders, midfield and attackers= 20
Plus they could adopt the American football idea of an offence and defensive team with ad breaks in between change overs to keep the sponsors happy.
The game may suffer at first until we get used to it but think of the bigger picture
