Nahh mate of course any band the sings "WE ALL LIVE IN A YELLOW SUBMARINE" are really knife edge
No malice meant
Its good marketing. Get them as kids....same with Thomas the Tank engine.
Brainwashing!!!
Nahh mate of course any band the sings "WE ALL LIVE IN A YELLOW SUBMARINE" are really knife edge
No malice meant
Nahh mate of course any band the sings "WE ALL LIVE IN A YELLOW SUBMARINE" are really knife edge
No malice meant
A song about an LSD trip though...
The one with the verse about the 19 Pakistanis living in a council flat?Anyone ever heard the original version of Get Back
The one with the verse about the 19 Pakistanis living in a council flat?
[yt]wcdSRXslCgM&NR[/yt]
1. Its about LSD.
2. Not a Beatles song.
They are amazing and are ENGLISH. Can it get any better?!
I like them, Not a fan so to say. There like the beatles and many other bands i can take or leave them. Like most bands they have some good records and some shit so to say. Anyway why ?
The beatles would not have half the succes had they not been HEAVILY influenced by Buddy Holly and the crickets (who as i said wrote there own & guess what recoreded there own records) ...... leading the way. There were loads of American Artists who did the same before the Beatles and paved the way from rockabilly/rock n roll to pop music which the beatles sort of claim they did artists like Pat Boone / Johnny Burnette / Ricky Nelson all doing what Buddy Holly had started ......... moving to the pop music of the early 60s and the Beatles just moved it further along. Yes they changed as time went by, but admit they took further influances from other artists like all groups do.
Anyway its all taste, and enjoy the Beatles NEW cds and games.
I sense an agenda here...Rockabilly & Rock'n'Roll..Buddy Holly..Pat Boone..Johnny Burnette..Are you a Teddy boy with a big Quiff and a Bass Guitar made out of a broom handle and a tea chest by any chance?
The Beatlesnalways awknowleged that the early part of their career was influenced heavily by Buddy Holly and American Rock'n'Roll as well as Skiffle and early backbeat and blues..the difference was they took those styles and INNOVATED away from them making them much more intrumental in taking music further.
The Artists you mentioned developed a style of playing and a look (just as important IMO) and stuck with it. The Beatles adopted different styles and genres throughout their brief time at the top to the extent that no two albums are stylistically the same.
Personally I am not a massive fan of the Beatles although I do own most of their works, but I accept that they moved music on in many different areas far more than anyone else (including Elvis and the Stones) and I don't think we will really see their like again.