Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Even that move was tainted by her ambition. Starting as a priest, her aim was to become Bishop of zlondon.She won’t be reading NSC or the comments in The Mirror or Guardian. Instead praying to our saviour.
Even that move was tainted by her ambition. Starting as a priest, her aim was to become Bishop of zlondon.She won’t be reading NSC or the comments in The Mirror or Guardian. Instead praying to our saviour.
Indeed...to become untouchable somehowEven that move was tainted by her ambition. Starting as a priest, her aim was to become Bishop of zlondon.
“zlondon” is perfect, sounds even more evil!… to become Bishop of zlondon.
Odds that she'll get off on the grounds that complete incompetence isn't a crime?One commentator said there wasn't a defining 'gotcha' moment.
But for her to claim that from 2007 to 2013, she didn't know that the Post Office carried out its own prosecutions with 100 dedicated staff, and that there were no bugs in Horizon, is beyond absurd.
If by some divine miracle of hers that she really wasn't aware of those things, then she should still be prosecuted for being so incomprehensibly unaware of people's lives being destroyed while she was CEO.
Computer Weekly published the story before anybody else, even Private Eye.And I remember reading about Horizon in Computer Weekly back in the day. There won’t have been many reading it then that didn’t think “it’s the computer system”.
There needs to be blood-letting. Even if she did apologise 6 times, and cried 4 times.Odds that she'll get off on the grounds that complete incompetence isn't a crime?
Oh I agree. But how often in the real world does justice come to the rich and powerful?There needs to be blood-letting. Even if she did apologise 6 times, and cried 4 times.
Indeed. The authorities will be crawling all over her answers, but as a layman, I am finding it difficult to pinpoint anywhere where she incriminated herself.Oh I agree. But how often in the real world does justice come to the rich and powerful?
No - there wasn't a gotcha moment, and I watched quite a lot of it. But what happened really was a constant chipping away at the narrative she was portraying. Almost everything she was confronted with she 'explained' away with comments like 'I can see how it reads now, but that's not what I meant at the time', and 'I can see how it can be taken that way, but...' (to which the obvious follow-up question which was left unsaid as it didn't need to be asked, was 'if you can see it could be read that way, then it probably was read that way').One commentator said there wasn't a defining 'gotcha' moment.
But for her to claim that from 2007 to 2013, she didn't know that the Post Office carried out its own prosecutions with 100 dedicated staff, and that there were no bugs in Horizon, is beyond absurd.
If by some divine miracle of hers that she really wasn't aware of those things, then she should still be prosecuted for being so incomprehensibly unaware of people's lives being destroyed while she was CEO.
Indeed. The authorities will be crawling all over her answers, but as a layman, I am finding it difficult to pinpoint anywhere where she incriminated herself.
Perhaps this wasn't the right time or vehicle to do this.
Not only did they compel the sub-postmasters to pay 'back' to the PO money that they hadn't actually taken in the first place, they then received bonuses because of it. That's straight theft from the sub-postmasters to the investigators / executives.It goes beyond the matters in this questioning. For example, where they compelled folk to pay back all ‘losses’, yet knew Horizon had key bugs on financial recording and remote access by bad actors was possible, that’s fraud. Directors and senior officials have very onerous responsibilities in statute and years of case law. They can’t use the excuse I’m just an unknowing lay person.
Odds that she'll get off on the grounds that complete incompetence isn't a crime?
Yes, my point entirely. Although suspect Boris is a bad example; his detractors like to think he's thick but he is intelligent enough to play along with this and fool them with his Boris dim-but-nice ha-ha jolly good persona.Why not, Boris Johnson has
I wouldn’t shed a single tear if she topped herself.I know this won’t be a popular thought judging by some of the extreme comments on here, but I worry about the Lord of the Flies type ‘judge, jury and executioner’ mantra that has taken hold. Vennels clearly has a massive amount of culpability and must face the legal consequences but if the current hounding of her leads to yet another suicide associated with this tragic saga, I for one will not be celebrating.
Really?I wouldn’t shed a single tear if she topped herself.
I’d rather see her go to prison but I’d be fine with either.
Mike Young Head of PO IT rubished this report. Why has he not appeared at the enquiry ?And I remember reading about Horizon in Computer Weekly back in the day. There won’t have been many reading it then that didn’t think “it’s the computer system”.
They can't find him - no-one seems to know where he is.Mike Young Head of PO IT rubished this report. Why has he not appeared at the enquiry ?