Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Possible bad news for a B777 [Malaysian MH370]



Bwian

Kiss my (_!_)
Jul 14, 2003
15,898




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,148
Goldstone
It also makes all of the Big Brother is watching you ramblings look pretty silly.
That's always looked incredibly silly.
 


kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
This is by far the best explanation I've read. I initially thought the depressurisation of the cabin theory sounded right, but a fire makes even more sense. Explains why the plane changed course, heading for the nearest safe airport, why the transponders were off, and why there is now no trace of the plane - it carried flying on autopilot, undetected by radar, until it eventually ran out of fuel and ditched somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean.

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
 


Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ

Hove / Παρος
Apr 7, 2006
6,769
Hove / Παρος
This is by far the best explanation I've read. I initially thought the depressurisation of the cabin theory sounded right, but a fire makes even more sense. Explains why the plane changed course, heading for the nearest safe airport, why the transponders were off, and why there is now no trace of the plane - it carried flying on autopilot, undetected by radar, until it eventually ran out of fuel and ditched somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean.

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/

I just find it hard to believe that no mayday call or distress signal was communicated
 


Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,156
Truro
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;6244670 said:
I just find it hard to believe that no mayday call or distress signal was communicated

I'm puzzled about all the mobile phones (apologies if this has already been covered). Sure, the passengers probably wouldn't have been near enough to a phone mast to make a call (it's difficult enough in the middle of some English cities), but anyone that realised something was up could have typed a text message - wouldn't the mobile keep trying to send it until it was in range of a mast? (Or disabled by salt water?)
 




Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,452
Sussex
I'm puzzled about all the mobile phones (apologies if this has already been covered). Sure, the passengers probably wouldn't have been near enough to a phone mast to make a call (it's difficult enough in the middle of some English cities), but anyone that realised something was up could have typed a text message - wouldn't the mobile keep trying to send it until it was in range of a mast? (Or disabled by salt water?)

Flew to 45k and killed passengers
 


kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;6244670 said:
I just find it hard to believe that no mayday call or distress signal was communicated

Pilots are taught to deal with the problem and navigate first, before communicating. They could simply have been overcome by smoke/lack of oxygen after setting the plane on autopilot but before they could send the distress signal. In a panicky situation they are probably doing all they can to control the plane or extinguish the fire. Communicating with air traffic control isn't really going to help anyway when you think about it, at least not until they've got the plane under control and are attempting an emergency landing.
 


Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ

Hove / Παρος
Apr 7, 2006
6,769
Hove / Παρος
I'm puzzled about all the mobile phones (apologies if this has already been covered). Sure, the passengers probably wouldn't have been near enough to a phone mast to make a call (it's difficult enough in the middle of some English cities), but anyone that realised something was up could have typed a text message - wouldn't the mobile keep trying to send it until it was in range of a mast? (Or disabled by salt water?)

I've always thought that the passengers would most likely have been completely oblivious to what was happening, it was a night flight, and it would not have been until a 4-5 hours later that they would have become aware of what was actually happening.
 




Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,156
Truro
Flew to 45k and killed passengers

Yeah, I get that. But would that have been too quick for anyone to type a quick text message? There would have been at least a few minutes of panic, between realising something was wrong, and everyone being dead, surely?
 


Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
Yeah, I get that. But would that have been too quick for anyone to type a quick text message? There would have been at least a few minutes of panic, between realising something was wrong, and everyone being dead, surely?

I'm not sure your first thought is to send a text when you are potentially looking at death in the face. Blind panic would probably be most people's reaction to a serious incident occurring during a flight
 


Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,156
Truro
I'm not sure your first thought is to send a text when you are potentially looking at death in the face. Blind panic would probably be most people's reaction to a serious incident occurring during a flight

Yes, I'd probably panic! But amongst 239 people, did NONE of them think "I need to tell my family I love them"?
 




Theatre of Trees

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
7,838
TQ2905
Yeah, I get that. But would that have been too quick for anyone to type a quick text message? There would have been at least a few minutes of panic, between realising something was wrong, and everyone being dead, surely?

Bear in mind that a rapid ascent would probably cause death within 30 seconds and the answer is no. In addition in the time leading up to death the brain becomes confused and disorientated.
 


cloud

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2011
3,036
Here, there and everywhere
I'm not sure your first thought is to send a text when you are potentially looking at death in the face. Blind panic would probably be most people's reaction to a serious incident occurring during a flight

Exactly. I was on a flight a month or so back where the plane filled with smoke. I was literally petrified with fear, preparing myself for the end, and certainly in no fit state to send anyone a text
 












dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,540
Burgess Hill
You can use your phone on Virgin Atlantic once seatbelt signs have gone off.

Planes are being steadily equipped with the facility to use mobiles (oddly enough I was on a BA flight on the day of the playoff second leg last year grrr bloody work etc and was getting updates by txt over the Atlantic), but I doubt this one was. If there was smoke or loss of oxygen at even normal height no messages would send, and if the plane then ended up over the ocean before ditching, quite possible it never got within a mobile signal range. I still find it odd that no wreckage has been spotted though, and also thought the black box continued to transmit signals (like the French one off Brazil)
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here