Bwian
Kiss my (_!_)
- Jul 14, 2003
- 15,898
Or maybe it's a double bluff, they want us to think that they really can't monitor us all the time.
eees comlicated.
Or maybe it's a double bluff, they want us to think that they really can't monitor us all the time.
That's always looked incredibly silly.It also makes all of the Big Brother is watching you ramblings look pretty silly.
This is by far the best explanation I've read. I initially thought the depressurisation of the cabin theory sounded right, but a fire makes even more sense. Explains why the plane changed course, heading for the nearest safe airport, why the transponders were off, and why there is now no trace of the plane - it carried flying on autopilot, undetected by radar, until it eventually ran out of fuel and ditched somewhere in the middle of the Indian Ocean.
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;6244670 said:I just find it hard to believe that no mayday call or distress signal was communicated
I'm puzzled about all the mobile phones (apologies if this has already been covered). Sure, the passengers probably wouldn't have been near enough to a phone mast to make a call (it's difficult enough in the middle of some English cities), but anyone that realised something was up could have typed a text message - wouldn't the mobile keep trying to send it until it was in range of a mast? (Or disabled by salt water?)
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;6244670 said:I just find it hard to believe that no mayday call or distress signal was communicated
I'm puzzled about all the mobile phones (apologies if this has already been covered). Sure, the passengers probably wouldn't have been near enough to a phone mast to make a call (it's difficult enough in the middle of some English cities), but anyone that realised something was up could have typed a text message - wouldn't the mobile keep trying to send it until it was in range of a mast? (Or disabled by salt water?)
Flew to 45k and killed passengers
Yeah, I get that. But would that have been too quick for anyone to type a quick text message? There would have been at least a few minutes of panic, between realising something was wrong, and everyone being dead, surely?
I'm not sure your first thought is to send a text when you are potentially looking at death in the face. Blind panic would probably be most people's reaction to a serious incident occurring during a flight
Yeah, I get that. But would that have been too quick for anyone to type a quick text message? There would have been at least a few minutes of panic, between realising something was wrong, and everyone being dead, surely?
I'm not sure your first thought is to send a text when you are potentially looking at death in the face. Blind panic would probably be most people's reaction to a serious incident occurring during a flight
Yes, I'd probably panic! But amongst 239 people, did NONE of them think "I need to tell my family I love them"?
have you ever managed to get a phone signal on a plane? am i missing something?
have you ever managed to get a phone signal on a plane? am i missing something?
People on the planes on 9/11 phoned home and left messages.
You can use your phone on Virgin Atlantic once seatbelt signs have gone off.
Bear in mind that a rapid ascent would probably cause death within 30 seconds.
How did the pilots survive?