Seasider78
Well-known member
- Nov 14, 2004
- 6,011
Was happily paying for ad free version of Tapatalk monthly so would happily do similar for the site if helps and puts some money into coffers.
At the risk of getting flamed, I went on NSC on my mobile to see what all the fuss was about and found it barely intrusive. I normally log in on my desktop which is excellent. The new banner on the bottom of the screen would certainly not put me off NSC. Don’t have a particularly large phone, iPhone 12, so maybe size matters, don’t know. Hope this helps.
I think I must be using a different NSC - I get the annoying wavy line ad and a few other statics but not as many as some are suggesting. Maybe because I've accepted all cookies ? Not sure why you wouldn't.
I’m not finding it a problem at all, either. Didnt have to close the bottom ad to type this, for instance (the keyboard covers it).
I was someone who liked Tapatalk, though, so maybe I’m just a bit weird.
There are a group of people who are so opposed to ads on sites that one silent ad banner is one too many. I'm never going to appease those people.Perhaps it’s an iPhone thing but using Safari browser, always logged in on my iPhone 11 Pro, there’s barely any intrusion apart from the wavy line test advert. If it stays I think I’ll get used to it. I don’t have any ad blockers or other apps preventing any sort of access.
No, I completely agree.@Bozza, here's a screenshot I just took from my phone (Omsung Phine, logged in). It contains no fewer than THREE ads for amazon on a single screen, at the point where I would usually write and submit a reply. Taken together they comprise about 40% of the screen. A tad excessive no? (they may well be an unintended by-product of the 'wavy line' ad feature you were trying out)
Choppy waters ahead for some users.Push the boat out.
I agree.Are some people new to the internet, or something? Ads on websites/Apps are nothing new and yes, while they might be a bit of a pain, is that a price not worth paying for the content?
As @Bozza said, the cost of running websites – like everything else – is going up all the time. If having a few ads around the place is the 'cost' to me for keeping North Stand Chat in existence, then I can live with that.
Thanks for the reminder.The one thing I have noticed is that if I'm not completely accurate with clicking on say 'The Big Board' link from a thread (on my iPhone) ... I end up on Amazon!
Sorry, yes.Also annoying, I've now noticed twice where auto-generated hyperlinks have been placed in my posts, as if I've added them. The latest one is:
[NSC] - How do YOU use NSC?
Site analytics tell me that 55% of NSC's traffic is on a phone or tablet with 45% on a computer, but what that doesn't tell me is how those who actually USE NSC, as opposed to visit from a random Google search (NSC is number one ranked for: snowboarding sexually) tend to do so. Are you all...www.northstandchat.com
The previous one was when I used the phrase "agent provocateur" in a recent post which then linked to the lingerie website (and maybe it'll so it again in this post?) which provoked a response from another poster. This feature could easily incite some unfortunate misunderstandings...
Cheers for taking time to provide explanation boss, appreciate itNo, I completely agree.
The way it works is this...
When you are viewing a thread there is a banner ad after the first post and the 14th. I somewhat arbitrarily chose 14 as it's a long way from 1, but also far enough away from 20 (the max posts you'll have on any page) that, on a full page of 20 posts, that by the time you've scrolled to the bottom, where there are additional banners, the 14th post ad has long since disappeared.
The problem comes if there are exactly 14 posts (or 34, 54, 74 etc) on the thread at that time as the lower page ads will also come into view making the page look ad-heavy. What I would like to do, but haven't been able to yet, is have the logic that says "if there are only 14 posts on this page, then don't show an ad after the 14th post).
You're right that the new test banner exacerbates this. Part of the test of the bottom banner is to see if existing on-page banners can be removed completely.
Can't even post my discontent without it saying disable my ad blocker(which I had to do to post this)
Just counted eleven ads on this page...nope, twelve
Adblocker back on
bye
If it’s technically possible, then this has to be the way to go. Happy to set up a repeating payment for an ad-free experience, but what numbers of subscribers and what level of payment would NSC need?It's not. Ad revenue, per 1,000 page views is lower than it's ever been, whilst site running costs are higher than they've ever been. This may be because I've not chased the more lucrative ad formats, primarily because lucrative tends to mean annoying.
I will be adding a voluntary paid option as, over the years, numerous people have asked if they can contribute, but....
1. It will absolutely be voluntary.
2. No-one will receive scaled-back functionality in any way.
3. ...but if donations enable some bells and whistles to be added to the site, they will be made available to donators either first or absolutely.
4. ...and donators will have a choice of ad-free templates.
Is it supposed to be moving? It's not for me... Just a box with a static wavy line on top of it, with an ad inside. Not that I'm complaining.it does catch the eye a lot as it rotates. If it remained static, as is the case on many sites that have a sticky bottom-of-page ad then I think it would be less jarring.
I've just saved the affiliate link and made first purchase via it today.Is it supposed to be moving? It's not for me... Just a box with a static wavy line on top of it, with an ad inside. Not that I'm complaining.
On a completely separate note, do you know if it's possible to use the NSC Amazon affiliate link when using the Amazon shopping app, as a default rather than clicking the link each time? If I can set that up for the wife than NSC might see a significant increase in income...