Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,327
Will they have DETECTOR VANS?
Eh? I'm looking at it from a fan's view. And no I don't work for them (seeing as I'm in favour of supposedly illegal streaming I'd have thought it was pretty obvious that I don't work for any sports broadcaster).Your looking at this from a simplistic Sky view… do you work for them??
Sky can keep all their monthly subscription for people who want to watch Bournemouth v Brentford…
I’m suggesting an add on or different payment for a specific team..
As I said EFL have ifollow why can’t EPL have the same ?
It is a breach of copyright. The premier league logo is copyrighted (not the game itself I think) and viewing that without a licence, outside of the jurisdiction where the broadcast is authorised, is a offence.No.
One of the chaps was jailed for hosting an online streaming website called IPTV, and the other was jailed for sharing his Netflix password with over a thousand people....
As far as I'm aware, there is nothing in UK law that makes receiving a football stream illegal.
Do you mean watching it, or attempting it?Asking for a friend, but 'Fake Taxi' is all above board isn't it?
The most serious offenders will be forced to attend Chelsea games in person.If they knock on the door and you have been watching a game, what is the maximum fine/imprisonment?
That would change the money available to Sky though and probably reduce the money clubs receive from TV rights. I probably wouldn't pay for Sky if I could pay the club directly for access to matches.Your looking at this from a simplistic Sky view… do you work for them??
Sky can keep all their monthly subscription for people who want to watch Bournemouth v Brentford…
I’m suggesting an add on or different payment for a specific team..
As I said EFL have ifollow why can’t EPL have the same ?
It is a breach of copyright. The premier league logo is copyrighted (not the game itself I think) and viewing that without a licence, outside of the jurisdiction where the broadcast is authorised, is a offence.
My issue is what the police are doing getting involved as I think (stand to be corrected) is that copyright infringement is a civil matter.
What on my meta quest VR set?Do you mean watching it, or attempting it?
Well there we go. So civil and criminal offenceIs infringement of copyright a criminal offence?
Deliberate infringement of copyright may be a criminal offence. Pursuing the criminals (e.g. when pirate or counterfeit copies of CDs/DVDs etc are being made, distributed or sold) can involve the police or trading standards departments.
Intellectual Property Crime | The Crown Prosecution Service
www.cps.gov.uk
They are much more likely to go after those selling the fire-sticks or hosting and providing access to the streams than those sat at home watching Wolves vs Fulham on a Saturday afternoon.
well there we go, civil and criminal offence.Is infringement of copyright a criminal offence?
Deliberate infringement of copyright may be a criminal offence. Pursuing the criminals (e.g. when pirate or counterfeit copies of CDs/DVDs etc are being made, distributed or sold) can involve the police or trading standards departments.
Intellectual Property Crime | The Crown Prosecution Service
www.cps.gov.uk
They are much more likely to go after those selling the fire-sticks or hosting and providing access to the streams than those sat at home watching Wolves vs Fulham on a Saturday afternoon.
All very strange given that with just a few clicks you can find any match online whenever you want. Even the Middlesbrough game was accessible with just 3 clicks of my mouse. It's so simple to access on line that the authorities potentially trying to visit 1000 homes is like putting your finger in the Hoover Dam to plug a leak.
What is the point?