Shorthand for Professor David Nutt?
I think 'call me Dave' Nutt lacks nuance.
Shorthand for Professor David Nutt?
How would that reduce crime committed by addicts to pay for drugs ? Or are you advocating ‘free’ drugs paid for by the taxpayer ?
Millions of people are addicted to something me included just to get through the day. What does that tell us about living in this country is it really that shit we all need a little something to survive it? Or is it the world in general
Same could be said for a lot of things. I'll let everyone's lurid imagination fill in the gaps. *cough* Glitter *cough*
No, the argument has to be based on risk benefit analysis.
The tide towards legalisation of cannabis is unlikely to turn (it will be legalized). Even the Isle of man has given up birching homosexuals.
But what will be next, if anything?
There is no such thing as the pejoritive entity 'drugs', though. Chemicals we ingest are drugs. I am a pharmacologist so I know of what I speak.
'War on drugs'
I think the 'drug culture' is exaggerated, though. Yes 95% of certain demographics are into it, balls deep, and in their echo chamber it will feel like everone is at it. But in other echo chambers there is equal certainty about resurrection, homosexuality and abortion being abominations, and drugs unavailable (even if they wanted some); take your pick.
I can tell you that in the pharmacology community there is total disinterest in legalising this or that. We see even pure drugs as risky. Why make clean heroin available? Have you never read Naked Lunch?
I would take more seriously the arguments of the pro legalization lobby if they weren't so nakedly 'me me me'. As a lapsed toofer, what's in it for me?
(and I'm looking at you, Swanny )
Everything depends on moderation - alcohol / other drugs / gambling etc - none particularly good for you but if used sparingly can be ok. A lot of examples that come out are often extreme addicts. There’s a whole spectrum on absolutely everything in my opinion - I like to let people make their own decisions and not judge tbh.
How would that reduce crime committed by addicts to pay for drugs ? Or are you advocating ‘free’ drugs paid for by the taxpayer ?
Well we're different then because I do judge people who ignore all the misery and death involved in the cocaine industry just for a buzz on a Saturday night.
Neither are great, but coked up mugs are on a different level to your general pissheads. They are an absolute nightmare to be around.
Weapons-grade dickheads.
I do wonder if the more snobby simple black and white comments come from those who have lived the most sheltered life with their heads in the sand. I guess it comes with the territory of an internet message board but why does everyone have to have an outlandish massive opinion on everything. Honestly, live and let live sometimes - got mates with all sorts of different lifestyles and vices and don’t feel the need to give an opinion to them on everything they do as long as they’re half sensible and happy
I agree with you and clearly haven't lived a sheltered life. We all need space to do something different and **** up every now and then.
I draw the line with cocaine though. It's a nasty little drug and I known many who have taken it with a sense of guilt. At the end of day if you buy it or deal it you are partly responsible for all sorts of nonsense that goes on abroad that ruins lives and communities.
I flip all the time on the issue of the legalisation of drugs. As a society we are completely hypocritical allowing alcohol to ruin more lives than cannabis, cocaine and heroin combined.
However the reality is that if you legalised drugs, you'd never remove the criminality. Alcohol and fags are legal but the black market (to undercut legal supplies) are worth billions.
I've no answer and sadly those in power don't have one either.
What I do know cocaine is generally taken in this country recreationally to allow you to drink more. It's an enabler for the alcohol problem in this country rather than being about the effects of cocaine itself.
It allows you to drink ten pints rather than five and turns you into a c@@@. Anyone who takes it in such a manner knows that as do their mates.
Agreed but also having been a little naive on my youth and not realising dozens of mates would dabble sometimes, there wasn’t any difference to being pissed from afar I noticed - some used it to be calmer or level headed - it affects different people in different ways for sure - eg some will be on it and not be coked up dickheads and you wouldn’t be able to even tell they were on it sometimes - trust me!
I speak from experience, and believe me, being around the herberts who have been on the Columbian marching powder will see my very rapid exit. They are manic, hyped and absolutely insufferable. Out of control animals, I just cannot tolerate it.
Yes agreed. Although whatever drug or whatever vice, there’s often deeper reasons as to why people have problems with it for sure. Eg those with issues who smoke a joint daily from habit rather than those who occasionally have a smoke. It’s sad as I’ve known people who have developed addictions from shit life changing events and a sense of ‘**** it I need something’. So can’t generalise everyone who has issues or those that don’t but do dabble in things into one bracket - like the poster earlier using the term ‘druggies’ - way too broad and also unempathetic imo.
Yep, it's far too easy to label those who take drugs as addicts. The majority clearly aren't although heroin users probably are. It should be clear that the vast majority of cocaine plus alcohol users are neither addicts of either.
I know many people who drink far less alcohol than me (over a month) but use theirs to get completely smashed (still they shit themselves) over a weekend.
Medically the affects of alcohol are probably worse on those who are older drink in moderation, but continually. However, the smashed weekenders are clearly having an effect on others.
This issue is completely missing from the debate.
Yes, having noticed several of your posts, we’re definitely different. I assume anyone who plays the lottery or has a bet on the football are also judged by you And I’m not even sticking up for myself here, just reality
I would say, there won’t be many people you won’t judge based on your posts and you seem like you need to let your hair down a little and live and let live. I won’t say the ‘I bet you’re fun at parties’ line - but I’m close
It obviously doesn't bother you one bit how that coke got to you? **** them eh, I want to let my hair down.
But then again there are few certainties in life other than:
- people will take chemical mind orientating substances (booze, drugs, whatever)
- people will gamble
- people will pay for sex
We still haven't worked out effective education for children re the first two and a safe environment for all three, as adults, re supply, demand and addiction.
edit - and you seem just as judgemental on the other side, seems odd to call faoileán judgemental
Not me no! Others, not a clue how it got there etc. And whilst there’s demand and there’s money to be made there will always be horrible parts to it and people getting ****ed over or whatever it is you say happens - unfortunate fact of life now. There will always be a market for highs - that’s just not gonna stop. I haven’t been judgemental at all - a bit of humour and comments based on a number of their posts..!